Movies

Vandread: Second Stage

I finished Vandread: Second Stage last week, but I was so busy this week that I haven’t had time to post any thoughts until now. As with the first series, I found myself quite pleased with this series. It’s more or less the continuation and conclusion to the first series, so this is isn’t too surprising. Potential spoilers ahead…

Pirates!

The men and women aboard the pirate ship Nirvana have learned to work well together and get past their cultural differences. This is a good thing because the enemy they face seems to be quite adaptable, raising the bar during each battle. We learn a lot about the enemy in this series, but it basically boils down to this: after initial colonists left from Earth, the planet suffered some sort of meltdown and the people of Earth could no longer reproduce. The Earthlings became jaded and twisted, consumed by hate and fear, eventually constructing a robotic fleet that would go after the colonists, harvesting their organs so that the Earthlings could continue to live. (I don’t know how much of this will make sense if you haven’t seen the series, but it would take too long to go through the entire story…)

The revelations are meted out at a reasonable pace and are mixed with various character development arcs that make up the series’ emotional core. Interestingly, the single most important character in the first series turns out to be something I barely noticed in the first series: the Paksis.

The Paksis

The Paksis, it’s alive!

The Paksis is the power plant of the Nirvana – it’s also apparently a living, sentient being. The Paksis was discovered on Earth as the colonists were beginning to expand into the galaxy. It’s unique properties made it ideal for an energy source, and so it was split into two: one remained on earth, the other was sent out with the colonists (eventually ending up on the Nirvana). The red Paksis has suffered as the people of Earth enslaved it to construct and power their harvester fleet, while the blue Paksis went on as part of the colonists’ fleet.

The Paksis is behind a lot of the confusing things that happen in the series – it’s the driving force behind the way ships combine and evolve, and it’s also got a self-preservation instinct that opened a wormhole and sent them light-years away in the first series. During many of the battles, the enemy shows the ability to adapt and evolve, mimicking many of the powers of our heroes. This lead to lots of questions until I realized that the Earthlings were simply using their Paksis to copy the fighting machines and tactics that were created by Nirvana’s crew. Steven Den Beste wrote about this a while back, using the Japanese word kiai (which essentially means “fighting spirit”) as a starting point:

All through the series the four primary characters seem to have an unreasonably fast learning curve regarding the abilities of the various versions of Vandreads as they appear, becoming adept at using them in just a few seconds. It’s not clear that the controls really matter, in fact. When they’re sufficiently motivated, the machine does what they need it to do pretty much no matter what control they use.

And afterwards they’re all weary, though Hibiki is usually the worst off in that regard. It’s because he’s been using his ki to make the machines run — because they’re not really machines.

What’s even more interesting is the cases where a character manages to raise their ki and when they do so it directly causes changes of some kind before our eyes. In Vandread it’s all about the Paksis; what they’re doing is to somehow link to the Paksis, which uses its mysterious powers to create what is needed. It isn’t necessarily a conscious need, of course. Hibiki does this more than anyone, and Meia/Dita/Jura do it to some extent, but Bart also does it once, in episode 16. (That is, the third episode of the second series.) Bart attains a sufficiently high emotional state that he is able to reach the Paksis, and as a result the Nirvana is changed to create banks of missile launchers.

Bart didn’t do that deliberately. But in the emotional state he was in at the time he didn’t question it. He was able to fully control them immediately. They did exactly what he expected them to do and needed them to do, even to where they struck only enemies and dodged around friends.

In essence, the entire series could be seen as a struggle between the red and blue Paksis, and the way the blue Paksis draws on the power of it’s crew leads to a lot of interesting character dynamics. As with the first series, there are several interesting character arcs here. One is the aformentioned arc with Bart, who becomes attached to sick little girl and is thus able to achieve an emotional state that allows him to interface with the Paksis (in order to protect the girl). It’s a fantastic episode, and it features a great reveal at the end:

Bart's new haircut

Bart’s new haircut

Hibiki continues to grow, as does his relationship with Dita, and it turns out that Hibiki plays a surprisingly important role in unifying the opposition to Earth’s harvester fleet. Oh, and speaking of surprises, there’s a big one towards the end. Some hints were dropped, but I doubt anyone saw it coming (indeed, at first, I was really confused by what happened).

All in all, the story progressed well and most of the unanswered questions were resolved. We get more background on Earth, we get more detail on why Tarak and Mejale are segregated by sex (though I’m still not totally clear on that one), and of course we find out a lot more about many of the characters. There were some nitpicks and open questions, but nothing major. For instance, what was the deal with Gascogne’s return? I was happy to see her come back and all, but a little baffled as to how she managed to do so… it seemed extraneous and unnecessary to me. Also, the battles with Earth’s forces got a little repetitive, but you’d expect that in a series where our heroes engage the enemy in every episode. However, as I noted in my review of the first series, nitpicks don’t seem to bother me with this series.

In the end, it’s a solid series, and pretty much exactly what I was looking for. By the end, I was sad to see the characters go, but pleased that there was some sort of closure to the story that made sense. Thanks again to Steven for the recommendation.

As usual, more screens and comments below the fold…

Ten Things I Like About Grindhouse

Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino‘s double-feature Grindhouse was released this weekend. Since it’s a pretty non-standard experience, I figured I’d avoid the standard review. Here are ten things I like about Grindhouse (in no particular order):

  • Unpretentious: This is a subject recently making the rounds at a bunch of blogs I read, and was kicked off by Steven Den Beste at metafilter:

    I glory in my plebeian tastes.

    I wallow in the crass, the banal, the mundane.

    I feel no shame at all in in cleaving to the middlebrow.

    And I derive great pleasure and satisfaction from the impotent spluttering of those who think they are my betters.

    This is my declaration of independence from the tyranny of pretension and snobbery.

    This might as well be the battle-cry of Rodriguez and Tarantino while making this movie. What else would you expect from two guys who profess a sincere love of bad exploitation films, and made this film to revel in their unpretentious glory.

  • The Previews: Grindhouse is comprised of two totally separate features, separated by several faux-previews (one preview precedes it as well) for non-existant films, such as Werewolf Women of the S.S. by Rob Zombie, Don’t Scream by Edgar Wright (of Shaun of the Dead fame), and Thanksgiving by Eli Roth. These previews are awesome, and I’m almost a little disapointed that I won’t get to see these bad, bad movies (or will I?). Particularly striking is Eli Roth’s Thanksgiving trailer, which mimics the late 1970s previews for the original Halloween. I say this is striking because Rob Zombie has decided that Halloween needs to be remade, and the preview was shown before Grindhouse started. Compared to Thanksgiving, the trailer for the new Halloween comes off as totally uninspired and boring. Quite frankly, I’d much rather see Zombie make Werewolf Women of the S.S. than “reimagine” a movie that simply doesn’t need to be remade.
  • Missing Reels: Grindhouse films were infamous for their low production values, and also because no one really seemed to care that much about the movies – for instance, lots of films would be shown in theaters even though they were missing reels. Rodriguez and Tarantino take full advantage of this, and elevate the missing reel to a legitimate art form.
  • Faux Low Production Values: Speaking of low production values, Rodriguez and Tarantino have peppered their segments with various conventions of bad exploitation movies. I call this “faux” low production values because they obviously have good production values, but actually do extra work to make it seem like a grindhouse movie. For instance, Rodriguez intentionally scratched up the negatives to make it seem like the prints were well- worn. There are several impeccably placed bad edits or poorly spliced reels (including the aformentioned missing reels).
  • Characters with names like “Stuntman Mike”: As I a friend noted, I don’t know if anyone but Tarantino could pull off a film with a major character named Stuntman Mike. Then again, Tarantino’s probably the only one who would think of doing such a thing.
  • Kurt Russell: He’s awesome. Also, it’s nice to see Michael Biehn working again.
  • Live Car Stunts: No CGI here (well, not in Tarantino’s segment, Death Proof). Instead, he hired kiwi stunt woman Zoe Bell to play herself in the movie and do some awesome stunts. It’s funny, but knowing that these stunts are really happening really does highten the tension.
  • A Seamless Intersection of the 1970s and the Present: Both films are set in the present day, but they look and feel like they were made in the 1970s. I don’t know how they managed to do this, but they did. Rodriguez’s Planet Terror perhaps looses a little edge because it’s so over-the-top that it approaches intentional comedy, while Tarantino’s Death Proof is a more sincere attempt to exactly reproduce a cheesy 1970s car movie.
  • Music: Rodriguez provides a good portion of the music for Planet Terror, and he manages to capture that cheesy 1970s feel. Great stuff. Tarantino has a good selection in Death Proof as well.
  • Dialogue: Tarantino’s trademark dialogue style is evident in Death Proof, especially in a great long-take in a diner, while Rodriguez’s Terror Planet is filled with hilarious cheesy one-liners.

The movies certainly aren’t pefect, and in fact, they’re intentionally bad. Rodriguez’s movie really ratchets up the action-packed pyrotechnics and gross-out pus-and-gore factor, while Tarantino structures his segment oddly and awkwardly paces the film (this is a little annoying to watch until you realize that it’s completely intentional, and the pacing picks up as the film proceeds). So yeah, this won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, but it was mine.

I could probably keep listing things I like about Grindhouse (the above list was done in a stream-of-consciousness style), which I think says something about the film. Interestingly, there’s probably someone right now who’s writing a “Ten Things I Hate About Grindhouse” and listing out the exact ten things I did. Go figure.

I believe the answer is Spartaaaaaaa

Time is short this week (I know, what else is new, but it’s especially short this week) so I’ll just point to some of the funniest photoshopped 300 parodies I’ve seen [via NeedCoffee]. I’ve included one of my favorites below, but I think the best one is in an animated gif about halfway down the page.

King Leonidas Plays Who Wants to be a Millionaire

Some other good ones: King Leonidas, Zidane Style, Wile E. Coyote, and This is Ping Pong. Oh, and of course, the PG Version.

Vandread

As requested, a review of Vandread. I finished the first series this week, and I must say that I’m quite pleased (this is in line with my initial thoughts). The first series doesn’t answer all the questions that were raised and the story isn’t complete, but it answers some and provides a great, satisfying finale. It’s a big, spectacular battle sequence, but the reason it’s satisfying has little to do with the action (though that’s fun too).

It occurrs to me that I haven’t actually described the story much yet. Sometime in the future, men and women seem to have segregated themselves on separate planets, and for three generations, a war has been waged between the sexes (apparently, in this future, technology provides a means to reproduce which does not require interaction between the sexes). It’s a little unclear why this rift exists, but it does, and it is exacerbated by propaganda depicting the opposite gender as monsters or worse. Hibiki is a mechanic that works on Vanguards (giant fighting robots or mechas), and as part of a dare, he attempts to steal one off a ship that is launching. Of course, he gets stuck on the ship, which is promptly attacked by women pirates. During the course of the battle, the ship takes moderate damage, but its core power generator has some rather nifty automatic repair mechanisms that sorta run haywire, merging the men’s ship with the women’s ship and transporting them far away. Hibiki and two other men are stuck on the ship with a bunch of women, and to make matters even worse, they seem to have stumbled into a new, unknown enemy that attacks on sight. Who are these new enemies, where do they come from, and what do they want? And can the three men work hand in hand with women to defeat this mysterious foe?

Nirvana

The male & female ships are merged into this ship, dubbed Nirvana

In general, the series has a lot of action, but the focus is pretty squarely on the characters. There are a few standouts who get the majority of attention, but many of the side characters are also interesting and likeable. The main characters are Hibiki and Dita (one of the female pirates), and their relationship has grown pretty steadily throughout the series to a point where they’re both acknowledging that they kinda like each other. Hibiki has had the clearest character arc so far and I think the ending of the first series is satisfying because of the way Hibiki handles the final battle. The story of the series doesn’t end, but Hibiki has definitely changed, and for the better. He was a bit of an annoying loudmouth at the beginning of the series, but he has grown, and it’s been handled well. Again, many of the characters are likeable (though not all – I’m not a huge fan of Jura or Barnette, but that’s only a minor beef, and I’m pretty sure they capture what the writers were going for anyway), and there are many little subplots and relationships that are entertaining and fun. My favorite subplot was the Christmas episode. I’m a total sucker for Christmas stories, and I absolutely loved that episode. (Screenshots and more comments on this subplot below the fold.) I’m guessing that some of these characters will be fleshed out a little more in the Second Stage (the stoic male doctor Duero and the female engineer Parfet will continue to flirt, Bart might actually become something of a leader and maybe get with BC, and Meia, well, I’m not sure what she’s up to, but I think she’s an interesting character.)

Bart and BC

Bart & BC share a moment

The animation is pretty and the action sequences are well executed. I mostly watched the series with dubbing on, though I took a gander at the subtitles as well (as I’ve noted before, I’m interested in the differences between translations, and will still occassionally watch a series with english dubbing and subtitles on at the same time). I haven’t settled on which is better in general, but the dubbing on this series wasn’t bad at all, so I ended up sticking with that for most of the series. The translation seems a bit funny at times (dialogue that is supposed to be witty banter or sound inspirational sometimes fall a little flat), but the general idea always gets through. The music is serviceable, but not great (I’m just spoiled by Yoko Kanno, I think). All in all though, it seems to be pretty well produced.

The story still has a fair share of open questions, but again it seems to be progressing nicely and I’m looking forward to watching the Second Stage. The series is clearly episodic with an overarching story underlying everything. This works well, as the episodic content allows the writers to develop the relationships between the characters. Lots of jokes are made exploring the differences between the two sexes, and it’s quite fun. The ending of this first series was great, though I can’t imagine getting that far and not wanting to watch Second Stage. The series was pretty much exactly what I expected, and it seems like it’s got a lot of the steriotypical Anime tropes, right down to the way the characters (i.e. faces, hair, clothes) are animated. Everything looks somewhat familiar, but not (I could swear I’ve seen half of these people before). For a beginner like myself, this definitely isn’t a bad thing, and it seems like a pretty good gateway drug. There are some aspects of the plot that might seem strange upon closer inspection, but I don’t seem to be getting hung up on nitpicks or anything. It’s funny, but corny stuff that might normally bother me doesn’t seem to be doing so with this series…

Again, I’m very much looking forward to the conclusion of the story, which I assume happens in the Second Stage. Thanks again to Steven for the recommendation… this is just about exactly what I was looking for.

More screenshots & commentary below the fold…

Vandread: Initial Thoughts

So I’ve seen the first 8 episodes of Vandread, and I should be finishing the first series early this week. So far, it’s pretty good. I’m holding off on pronouncing any final verdict until I reach the end, but I have to admit that I’m enjoying myself so far and I’m kinda looking forward to a long-term story that has an actual ending.

American TV has recently experienced an explosion of the sprawling, multi-season story. This has been bolstered by the emergence of the TV DVD market, which makes it possible to catch up with a series really quickly. The problem is that I honestly think this Writers of Lost parody is a fairly accurate representation of what goes on in the writing office for some of these series. I gave up on Lost after watching the first season on DVD and I won’t watch another episode until someone tells me there’s a definite ending and that it’s a good ending that actually makes sense. I actually enjoyed watching the first batch of Heroes episodes, but I get that same sorta feeling that the writers are just screwing around and making it up as they go along. As Dalton Ross writes in a recent editorial in Entertainment Weekly, “As much as I love all the drawn-out mysteries and soap opera shenanigans, there’s something I crave even more — closure.”

This is one of the things about Anime that really appeals to me. I’m sure there are a bunch of ongoing series, but it seems like a lot of the series have definite ends, and thus have good, long yet concise character arcs, etc…

Vandread has its share of mysteries and open questions (especially in the first couple of episodes), but the series has progressed nicely, and I’m looking forward to the ending. Indeed, I already put Vandread: Second Stage in my Netflix queue. If the ending of the first series stinks, I can always remove it, but I don’t anticipate any major issues.

As usual, I’m noticing little bits and pieces of culture that I’m not familiar with. For instance, when Dita first encounters Hibiki, she makes some sort of greeting gesture with her hand (I added screenshots in the extended entry below). Dita appears to be a UFO nut, so maybe that gesture is some sort of universal greeting or something (like the lights and tones at the end of Close Encounters). Hibiki returns the gesture (further supporting the universal greeting theory), and then promptly runs away. Did I mention that in the Vandread universe, men and women have segregated themselves to different planets and are pretty much at war with one another? I thought this was a little strange, but it makes for some interesting dynamics (and I’m sure it will play a role in the progression of the series).

Dita chases Hibiki

More screenshots & comments in the extended entry below…

Thermopylae is a wedge issue!

It’s All Geek to Me by Neal Stephenson: After a lengthy absence, Stephenson returns with an oped in the NY Times. He tackles the film 300 from various geeky angles, and in the process, he hits on a few ideas that I’ve been thinking about recently.

Critics at a festival in Berlin walked out, and accused its director of being on the Bush payroll.

Thermopylae is a wedge issue!

Lefties can’t abide lionizing a bunch of militaristic slave-owners (even if they did happen to be long-haired supporters of women’s rights). So you might think that righties would love the film. But they’re nervous that Emperor Xerxes of Persia, not the freedom-loving Leonidas, might be George Bush.

This seems to be happening more and more these days. Somebody makes a movie without any intention of making a political statement, and then liberals and conservatives fall all over themelves in an attempt to spin the movie in their favor. This isn’t limited to movies or other forms of art either (nor is it limited to politics, for that matter – people often spin things in subjective ways). For instance, talk to anyone who has strong opinions about politics and they’ll tell you that the media is biased against them. It’s amusing, really.

When I saw 300, the thought that this might be applicable to our current political situation occurred to me, but I dismissed it pretty quickly. I’m sick of politics and have been for a while now, which brings me to another point Stephenson makes:

When science fiction tackles classical themes, the results may look a bit odd to some, but the audience – which is increasingly the mainstream audience – is sufficiently hungry for this kind of material (and, perhaps, suspicious of anything that’s overly polished) that it is willing to overlook the occasional mistake, or make up for it by shouting hilarious things from the balcony. These people don’t need irony or campiness self-consciously pointed out to them, any more than they need a laugh track to enjoy “The Simpsons.”

The Spartan phalanx presents itself to foes as a wall of shields, bristling with spears, its members squatting behind their defenses, anonymous and unknowable, until they break formation and stand out alone, practically naked, soft, exposed and recognizable as individuals.

The audience members watching them play the same game: media-weary, hunkered down behind thick irony, flinging verbal jabs at the screen – until they see something that moves them. Then they’ll come out and feel. But at the first hint of politics, they’ll jump back behind their shield-wall, just like the Spartans when millions of Persian arrows blot out the sun, and wait until the noise stops.

I’ve been thinking a lot about politics in art, and I don’t think it’s as influential as it once was. The modern world is so saturated with politics and hyperbolic outrage that yet another movie or album that decries war or globalization or secularization or whatever is just, well, lame. You look at someone like George Orwell and you can see why he wrote what he did and why he wrote how he wrote. If he were writing today, I bet it would seem gimmicky and lame.

Alas, at the end of the article, it didn’t mention that Stephenson would be releasing a new book anytime soon. I know he’s working on the Diamond Age Miniseries, but I’m still impatient for his next book, whatever it may be. These NY Times opeds are nice and all, but they seem too short for Stephenson. I like it better when he rambles on for a few hundred pages.

Watchmen

Every couple of years, someone gets the bright idea to adapt Alan Moore’s classic graphic novel Watchmen into a movie. Some work is done, then the project falls flat. To get an idea for how long this has been going on, I wrote about it on this blog over five years ago, and at that point, it had already been stuck in “development hell” for over a decade.

For a long time, Terry Gilliam was attached to direct. He was a big name, but he was also quite ambitious and known for getting mired in long, failed productions. By the end, he wanted to make a 12 hour film (or mini-series) out of the comic. One would have to applaud that sort of ambitious thinking, but it’s easy to see how Gilliam didn’t get anywhere. In any case, he eventually fell off the map, and in one of the more retarded Hollywood moves of recent history, screenwriter David Hayter was brought on not only to revise the existing Sam Hamm script (which was good, except for the changed ending) but also to direct. Hayter had achieved some clout because of his involvement with the X-Men films, but handing such a complex story to a first-time director seemed quite foolish. Luckily, that period didn’t last long, and a few years later, up-and-coming indie director Darren Aronofsky attached himself to the project. This was all kinds of cool and the film geek community was delighted. Actors started clamoring for roles, including Jude Law, who’s apparently quite the fanboy. Alas, it was not to be. Aronofsky left the production to focus on his dream project, The Fountain.

Paramount was still anxious to get the film started, so they sought out a replacement and eventually settled on Paul Greengrass. Though not as well-known as Gilliam and not as hip and trendy as Aronofsky, the choice of Greengrass was inspired and of all the directors who’ve expressed interest in Watchmen, I think he would have been my favorite. Like Aronofsky, Greengrass is an up-and-coming director. However, unlike anyone else attached to the project, Greengrass has also proven to be quite adept at making movies with a political element that doesn’t suck (United 93, Bloody Sunday), while at the same time being able to direct a decent character-based action movie (The Bourne Supremacy). Watchmen would involve interweaving elements of both, among other thematic material. Unfortunately, an executive shuffle at Paramount meant that Watchmen would again get the boot. This is understandable. When a major studio undergoes a change in leadership, all greenlit projects are scrutinized. Watchmen had a long history of false-starts, a big budget, and a story that was… not family friendly (to put it nicely). Put yourself in the position of a newly appointed studio head, and then ask yourself if you’d really want to start off by attempting to make what many consider an unfilmable movie?

So the plug was pulled yet again, and Greengrass went on to make United 93 instead (and it’s a masterpiece, imhbco). The movie sat in limbo until about a year ago, when director Zack Snyder, who was in post-production for the now-released hit 300 (an adaptation of Frank Miller’s classic comic), was tasked with bringing Watchmen to the screen. 300 was released last week and ground it’s way to an astounding $70 million opening weekend. I saw it, and while I enjoyed it, I have to admit that I’m not sure he’s going to be able to handle Watchmen‘s complex themes. He’s certainly talented, and I’m not counting him out, but his previous work simply doesn’t tackle anything as ambitious as Watchmen. He directed a spirited remake of Dawn of the Dead that was quite entertaining (certainly among the best of the recent spate of horror movie remakes) but not exactly challenging. Ditto for the cliched but gorgeous and action-packed 300. I have to admit that I’m intrigued by the possibility of a Watchmen movie, and Snyder isn’t a bad choice. Indeed, the unexpected success of 300 augurs well for the Watchmen production, which is now slated to start shooting this summer. For that alone, Snyder deserves some credit, as he might be the one who will finally bring it to the screen.

Indeed, Snyder appears to have begun some early concept work on his new project. Last summer, at the San Diego Comic-Con, Snyder and Miller showed some footage from 300 and did a Q and A. The footage was too bloody for an official widespread release, but of course, you can’t stop the signal. It appeared on You Tube shortly after the comic-con and has supposedly played an important role in the marketing of 300. However, just a few weeks ago, someone discovered a little secret burried in the footage. Hidden between warring Spartans and Persians is a single frame of what appears to be Rorschach (perhaps the most recognizeable character from the Watchmen comic):

Rorschach

Well, it’s a little dark (click the image for a much higher resolution image), but it’s definitely Rorschach. The high resolution image was released by Harry Knowles, who also confirms that it is an official “test shot” that Snyder worked on (i.e. it won’t be a part of the final film, it’s just a concept shot).

I think it looks great, though it’s a little difficult to tell with a static image how they’re really going to do the mask (in the comic, the ink blot pattern changes from frame to frame, though there are some duplicates and consistency at work).

My guess is that after all this time, Watchmen is finally on its way to the big screen. Will it be good? The talent is certainly there, from the producers to the screenwriters to the director (though I really wanted to see what Greengrass would do with it, I’m sure Snyder will do fine and may even surprise me), but I’ll believe it when I see it. I have to admit that I’m a little hesitant about how this film will turn out though, and I worry that it will fall into the same traps that V for Vendetta did. Watchmen seems to be very much a product of its time, for instance, and I’d worry that the filmmakers will want to update it. To be fair, I have not heard that this will be happening, though I was mildly disapointed by the change to the ending that I read in Sam Hamm’s original script (however, I read that script a long time ago — Hayter has supposedly revised the script to be more faithful to the source material, but time will tell). Adaptations in general are challenging, as some of the things that make a piece of art work in one medium don’t necessarily translate well to another medium. In the end, I’ll still be excited to see this finally reach the screen… and for the first time in many years, it looks like there’s a fair chance that it’s going to happen.

Unrelated to Watchmen, but pretty funny, is that the tendency to sneak a single frame into a trailer is apparently becoming somewhat common: see the hidden frame in Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto trailer. Hilarious.

Mental Inertia

As I waded through dozens of recommendations for Anime series (thanks again to everyone who contributed), I began to wonder about a few things. Anime seems to be a pretty vast subject and while I had touched the tip of the iceberg in the past, I really didn’t have a good feel for what was available. So I asked for recommendations, and now I’m on my way. But it’s not like I just realized that I wanted to watch more Anime. I’ve wanted to do that for a little while, but I’ve only recently acted on it. What took so long? Why is it so hard to get started?

This isn’t something that’s limited to deciding what to watch either. I find that just getting started is often the most difficult part of a task (or, at least, the part I seem to get stuck on the most). Sometimes it’s difficult to deal with the novelty of a thing, other times a project seems completely overwhelming. But after I’ve begun, things don’t seem so novel or overwhelming anymore. I occasionally find myself hesitant to start a new book or load up a new video game, but once I do, things flow pretty easily (unless the book or game is a really bad one). I have a bunch of ideas for blog posts that I never get around to attacking, but usually once I start writing, ideas flow much more readily. At work, I’ll sometimes find myself struggling to get started on a task, but once I get past that initial push, I’m fine. Sure, there are excuses for all of these (interruptions, email, and meetings, for instance), but while they are sometimes true obstacles, they often strike me as rationalizations. Just getting started is the problem, but once I get into the flow, it’s easy to keep going.

Joel Spolsky wrote an excellent essay on the subject called Fire and Motion:

Many of my days go like this: (1) get into work (2) check email, read the web, etc. (3) decide that I might as well have lunch before getting to work (4) get back from lunch (5) check email, read the web, etc. (6) finally decide that I’ve got to get started (7) check email, read the web, etc. (8) decide again that I really have to get started (9) launch the damn editor and (10) write code nonstop until I don’t realize that it’s already 7:30 pm.

Somewhere between step 8 and step 9 there seems to be a bug, because I can’t always make it across that chasm.For me, just getting started is the only hard thing. An object at rest tends to remain at rest. There’s something incredible heavy in my brain that is extremely hard to get up to speed, but once it’s rolling at full speed, it takes no effort to keep it going.

It’s an excellent point, and there does seem to be some sort of mental inertia at work here. But why? Why is it so difficult to get started?

When I think about this, I realize that this is a relatively new phenomenon for me. I don’t remember having this sort of difficulty ten years ago. What’s different? Well, I’m ten years older. The conventional wisdom is that it becomes more difficult to learn new things (i.e. to start something new) as you get older. There is some supporting evidence having to do with how the human brain becomes less malleable with time, but I’m not sure that paints the full picture. I think a big part of the problem is that as I got older, my standards rose.

Let me back up for a moment. A few years ago, a friend attempted to teach me how to drive a stick. I’d driven a automatic transmission my whole life up until that point, so the process of learning a manual transmission proved to be a challenging one. The actual mechanics of it are pretty straightforward and easily internalized. Sitting down and actually doing it, though, was another story. Intellectually, I knew what was going on, but it can be a little difficult to overcome muscle memory. I had a lot of trouble at first (and since I haven’t driven a stick since then, I’d probably still have a lot of trouble today) and got extremely frustrated. My friend (who had gone through the same thing herself) laughed at it, making my lack of success even more infuriating. Eventually she explained to me that it wasn’t that I was doing a bad job. It was that I was so used to being able to pick up something new and run with it, that when I had to do something extra challenging that took a little longer to pick up, I became frustrated. In short, I had higher standards for myself than I should have.

I think, perhaps, that’s why it’s difficult to start something new. It’s not that learning has become harder, it’s that I’ve become less tolerant of failure. My standards are higher, and that will sometimes make it hard to start something. This post, for example, has been brewing in my head for a while, but I had trouble getting started. This happens all the time, and I’ve actually got a bunch of ideas for posts stashed away somewhere. I’ve even written about this before, though only in a tangential way:

This weblog has come a long way over the three and a half years since I started it, and at this point, it barely resembles what it used to be. I started out somewhat slowly, just to get an understanding of what this blogging thing was and how to work it (remember, this was almost four years ago and blogs weren’t nearly as common as they are now), but I eventually worked up into posting about once a day, on average. At that time, a post consisted mainly of a link and maybe a summary or some short commentary. Then a funny thing happened, I noticed that my blog was identical to any number of other blogs, and thus wasn’t very compelling. So I got serious about it, and started really seeking out new and unusual things. I tried to shift focus away from the beaten path and started to make more substantial contributions. I think I did well at this, but it couldn’t really last. It was difficult to find the offbeat stuff, even as I poured through massive quantities of blogs, articles and other information (which caused problems of it’s own). I slowed down, eventually falling into an extremely irregular posting schedule on the order of once a month, which I have since attempted to correct, with, I hope, some success. I recently noticed that I have been slumping somewhat, though I’m still technically keeping to my schedule.

Part of the reason I was slumping back then was that my standards were rising again. The problem is that I want what I write to turn out good, and my standards are high (relatively speaking – this is only a blog, after all). So when I sit down to write, I wonder if I’ll actually be able to do the subject justice. At a certain point, though, you just have to pull the trigger and get started. The rest comes naturally. Is this post better than I had imagined? Probably not, but then, if I waited until it was perfect, I’d never post anything (and plus, that sorta defeats the purpose of blogging).

One of the things I’ve noticed since changing my schedule to post at least twice a week is that it forces me to lower my standards a bit, just so that I can get something out on time. Back when I started the one post a week schedule, I found that those posts were getting pretty long. I thought they were pretty good too, but as time went on, I wasn’t able to keep up with my rising expectations. There’s nothing inherently wrong with high expectations, but I’ve found it’s good every now and again to adjust course. Even a well made clock drifts and must be calibrated from time to time, and so we must calibrate ourselves from time to time as well.

Update 3.15.07: It occurs to me that this post is overly-serious and may give you the wrong idea. In the comments, Pete notes that watching Anime is supposed to be fun. I agree wholeheartedly, and I didn’t mean to imply differently. The same goes for blogging – I wrote a decent amount in this post about how blogging is difficult for me, but that’s not really the right way to put it. I enjoy blogging too, that’s why I do it. Sometimes I overthink things, and that’s probably what I was doing in this post, but I think the main point holds. Learning can be impaired by high standards.

Anime

In case you can’t tell, I like movies. A lot. I’ll watch just about anything, and indeed, I’ve spent a fair amount of time seeking out the strange and offbeat films that most of my friends have never heard of. When it comes to this sort of thing, I tend to go into phases. Hong Kong Action, Italian Horror, and Japanese Yakuza films (among many other genres) have captured my attention for a time. As such, it shouldn’t be surprising that I’ve seen my fair share of Japanese animation. For the most part, my exposure has been limited to films, but I’ve seen a few series as well.

Now, I’ve consumed enough anime, and I read enough blogs in the Otakusphere, to know what I’m getting into here. I recently played along with the Filmspotting podcast’s Animation Marathon, which contained a bunch of anime films (several of which I’d already seen, but welcomed the chance to revisit). The marathon is over, but I feel like I’m just getting started. The only problem is that I’m not sure where to go from here. So, in an attempt to figure this out, I’m going to list out what I’ve seen, what I’m looking for, and some series I know about but haven’t seen yet. If you have any recommendations, feel free to drop a comment, but I’ve been cautioned to take recommendations with a grain of salt (which you kinda have to do for anything subjective like this).

What I’ve seen: (in rough chronological order)

  • Akira: My first forray into anime (unless you count Voltron) was largely unappreciated by me, thanks mostly to a horrible translation and bad transfer. I basically thought it was an incoherent mess (and I stand by that, given the crappy VHS experience), but when I revisited it during the marathon, I saw the new translation and digital transfer and was pleasantly surprised. I didn’t love it, as the characters were annoying and generally unlikeable, but my opinion had greatly improved.
  • Ninja Scroll: At the recommendation of a friend, I rented this once. I have almost no recollection of this movie at all. I wanna say there was a scene on a boat at one point. I remember liking it, but not loving it.
  • Ghost in the Shell: I enjoyed this movie the first time I saw it, but I have to admit that it was a little out of my teenage self’s league. I have since seen it several times and have grown to appreciate some of the challenging and thought provoking questions it raises.
  • Princess Mononoke: I distinctly remember watching a documentary on animation sometime around 1998 and seeing some clips from this movie and being awestruck. When it was finally released in the states, I jumped at the chance to see it and absolutely loved it. It’s a fantastic film… yet, I have to admit that I haven’t seen it since then and many of the details escape me. This is probably worth revisiting at some point.
  • Spirited Away: As much as I liked Princess Mononoke, this movie topped it, and when I learned that it was the same filmmaker, I was somewhat astounded. I rented it because it had won an Oscar, not because I knew it was from the makers of Princess Mononoke. It’s a great film, and I gave it the best film award in the animation marathon.
  • Haibane Renmei: There was a bit of a gap between Spirited Away and this series (which happens to be my first actual anime series), and I hold Haibane Renmei responsible for my more recent interest in Anime. I checked it out because of the enthusiastic recommendations of Steven Den Beste, and, well, just about everybody else who has ever mentioned it. Put simply, this series is superb. Some have claimed that it’s almost too good, and that everything else that follows will be a letdown. This might be true, but I’ve had about a year to cool off, and I think I should be fine:P
  • Cowboy Bebop: The Movie: I cought this on Comcast OnDemand, and thought it was great. Unlike most of what I’d seen before, this was just good, clean action-packed fun. The music was so great I went out and bought a bunch of soundtrack CDs and listen to them often. As far as anime gateway drugs go, I’d think this would be a good choice (right behind Miyazaki films, natch).
  • Serial Experiments Lain: This was my next series, and boy was it a doozy. I’d heard good things and the technological themes appealed to me, so I netflixed it. At this point, I’m still not sure what the heck it’s all about. As I mention in the linked post from the Kaedrin Forum, I think it’s perhaps a little too obtuse and deliberate, but also quite good. Once I figured out the “unreliable narration” angle, a lot of things clicked into place, but I need to watch the series again sometime to really work things out.
  • Grave of the Fireflies: One of the few movies in the animation marathon I’d never seen before, and, well, it’s great, but I’m pretty traumatized by this. Since this was the last new thing I’ve seen, I think my next movie/series should be something a little more upbeat. Please.
  • Miscellaneous Stuff: I’ve seen a handful of episodes from a bunch of series on Adult Swim, but this is far from ideal. I’ve seen a few episodes of Inuyasha, Fullmetal Alchemist, Witch Hunter Robin and a bunch of other series. For the most part, this stuff just went over my head, probably because I was jumping into the middle of various series, and so I never really got into anything there. I vaguely remember watching Vampire Hunter D a long time ago, but remember very little about it (I also remember watching some othe vampire hunter anime show, but again, don’t remember much). I remember attempting to watch some Mecha related anime movie on cable. For the most part, it didn’t make sense and I never finished it (don’t even remember the name). I watched Steamboy and was blown away with the visuals, even if I had totally lost interest by the end of the movie (same issues here as with Akira, which makes sense because it’s made by the same people). I also recently went back and filled in most of Miyazaki’s catalog, though there are still a few films I’ve yet to see. They’re all great, though I don’t think any approaches Spirited Away (Howl’s Moving Castle was awesome until about 2/3 of the way through, at which point it began to unravel).

That’s pretty much it. I’m sure I missed a few things here or there, but that should give you a rough idea where I’m at and what I think of the genre. Overall, it’s actually been pretty good to me, and there aren’t many movies/shows I disliked. However, at this point, I’m not really sure where to go next.

What I’m looking for: For the next series I watch, I’m going to impose a few somewhat strict guidelines. I want to watch a series, but not something too long. I don’t want to have to wade through 18 DVDs or anything absurd like that. A 13 or 26 episode series would be fine. At some point, I’m sure I’ll move on to longer series, but for now, let’s keep it relatively short. Sort of related, I’d like the story to be complete (or at least, the arc should be complete). I don’t want to have to wait for new DVDs to come out before I can finish the series! I’d like something that has a good story arc (i.e. a character or plot based narrative), and preferably one that doesn’t have a downer ending (I’ve had my fill with Grave of the Fireflies, thank you). I’m also looking for something that’s a little more action-packed and fun than what I’ve been watching recently (i.e. not something like Serial Experiments Lain). I don’t mind kid’s shows, but that’s not exactly what I’m looking for (I’m flexible on this one though). All recommendations are welcome, as I’ll certainly need something after this… but this is what I’m looking for at the moment. Oh, one last requirement, the series needs to be available on Netflix.

What I’m currently considering: I seem to have fallen into reading a significant portion of the Otakusphere (SDB, Fledge, Shamus, Pixy, Alex, Pete, and a couple of others), and even if I have no idea what they’re talking about most of the time, I’ll occasionally notice a title here or there, so I have some ideas as to what could come next. Two pages I’ve been referring to while writing this post are Steven’s reviews and Steve Yegge’s Anime post. Unfortunately, I’ve already had to nix a couple of series, but I haven’t looked real hard at most of these.

  • Cowboy Bebop: When I think about what I want for my next series, I keep thinking about the Cowboy Bebop movie. That’s exactly what I’m looking for, so you’d think this series would be a perfect fit. However, my understanding is that it has something of a downer ending. I’ll definitely be watching this series, and probably sooner rather than later, but not next.
  • Martian Successor Nadesico: I seem to recall hearing that this was an excellent series to start with, however, it sorta fails the Netflix test: disc 5 is not available (the other discs are). The series is apparently out of print, and apparently Netflix’s copy of disc 5 took a beating. This is most frustrating, as this sounds exactly like what I want. I might check to see if I can download the episodes on disc 5 and netflix the rest, but that just seems like a hassle. It sounds like a blast though, and I’d really like to check this one out.
  • Noir: I considered this because it sounds really interesting… unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to fit what I’m looking for right now. However, I am intrigued and will most likely watch this at some point.
  • Angelic Layer: Sounds interesting, but I need to look into it more.
  • Twelve Kingdoms: Based mostly on Steve Yegge’s enthusiastic recommendation. A quick quote from his post which has broad applicability to anime and foreign movies in general:

    You know how little kids at a certain age like to watch the same movie over and over and over again, for up to a year, and child psychologists say that each time they see it they’re seeing it from a new perspective? Well, 12 Kingdoms was like that for us. There’s so much for a Westerner to take in. We missed a lot of it the first time around. It took at least 3 or 4 viewings before the patterns started taking shape in our minds.

    Cool stuff. Still, I need to look into this series a little more. SDB was a little frustrated because it wasn’t finished yet, but at this point, I think it has finished (but I’m not sure)

  • Last Exile: Another Steve Yegge recommendation, though I’ve heard this has a bit of a downer ending too (but I need to look into that).

Well, since I’m significantly past my midnight deadline, I figure this is as good a place as any to stop. At this point, I’m not at all sure what to get. Maybe I’m being too specific with my requirements… Let me know what you think. Again, all recommendations are welcome and I’ll probably consider a bunch more than are listed above… or maybe I’m overthinking this and will be bitten by the paradox of choice.

Friday is Apparently List Day

After several years of blogging, I’ve finally figured out that Friday is list day. So here are a few lists:

Random Ten:

  • Guster – “Two Points For Honesty”
  • Amon Tobin – “Keepin’ It Steel (The Anvil Track)”
  • Radiohead – “Optimistic”
  • Four Tet – “As Serious As Your Life”
  • The Bad Plus – “Keep the Bugs Off Your Glass and the Bears Off Your Ass”
  • Lynyrd Skynyrd – “Free Bird” (Yee ha!)
  • Yoko Kanno & Seatbelts – “Clutch”
  • Franz Ferdinand – “Michael”
  • Pink Floyd – “Money”
  • Nine Inch Nails – “Awitha Teetha” (Well, it’s really just With Teeth, but I prefer Meathead’s title because it more accurately reflects the way the song sounds. Incidentally, I didn’t remember how Meathead spelled that, so I mistakenly googled for “awith teetha.” Google, ever thoughtful, corrected my spelling. This is mildly amusing.)

The Two Greatest Reviews of NIN’s With Teeth:

  • The Aformentioned Meathead Review: Overall score of [AWITHA_TEETHA]: 9,116 out of 9,652 stars
  • Tiny Mix Tapes Review: Concise but informative, and actually somewhat accurate. Sadly, Trentie Poo doesn’t seem likely to reverse the trend with his new album, Year Zero (which comes out in just a few weeks, only two years after Awitha Teetha and 17 years ahead of my speculation), but we shall see, I guess. If you’re interested, there’s a thread in the Kaedrin Forum where we talk about the new songs that have been “leaked” (link to the songs in the thread) and the lame political overtones to the new album.

Three Documentaries I Watched Recently:

  • This Film Is Not Yet Rated: Or “Mocking the MPAA’s rating process.” And there’s plenty to mock. It’s a little gimmicky and sanctimonious, but it makes some good points and is pretty entertaining to watch (after all, most of the films that are covered are ones that get the dreaded NC-17, and that generally only happens because of sex scenes). Worth a watch if you’re interested in the subject or you want to see a bunch of uncensored… uh… art…
  • Aliens of the Deep: Who wouldn’t love to be James Cameron? The dude makes the biggest movie evar, then decides to take a break from filmmaking for a while and engage in expensive hobbies (and hang out with his brothers) like deep sea diving. He did this before in a movie called Ghosts of the Abyss, where he chronicles an expedition to the Titanic wreck (that film is only so-so, imho). This time around, he brings along a bunch of Nasa scientists who observe the preternaturally weird lifeforms that thrive deep in the ocean where no sunlight reaches and speculate on alien life forms. Take a look at this one:

    What the heck is this thing?

    Zoinks! That thing is amazing. The extended cut of the movie on the DVD is good and worth watching, but it can get a bit slow or meander a bit at times. Still, fascinating stuff.

  • Grizzly Man: Werner Herzog’s portrait of grizzly bear activist Timothy Treadwell, who spent 13 years among the grizzlies before they inevitably killed him (and his girlfriend). This movie is creepy on many levels. Treadwell himself would be creepy enough even if we didn’t know what eventually happened to him, but his death looms over the entire film. The worst part is that Treadwell is constantly proclaiming his love for the bears and nature in general, but you can clearly see (even early in the film, long before his death) how absolutely and completely the bears do not reciprocate in any way. Treadwell was clearly aware of the dangers (at least on an intellectual level), and often loudly trumpets them, but he thinks he is somehow exceptional. He thinks he’s been accepted by the bear community because he loves them. It’s almost like a greek tragedy or something. The grand majority of the footage was provided by Treadwell himself, who had compiled nearly 100 hours of footage on the last 5 of his trips to Alaskan bear country. Herzog sifted through all that footage and intercut it with the requisite interviews with family, friends, and experts. It’s quite a good film, though a little disturbing and not all that pleasant. It was actually a little interesting to watch this after watching Aliens of the Deep, as the contrast between people who treat nature with a degree of awe and respect (i.e. people who don’t invite death) and Treadwell, who clearly loves and cherishes nature, but tragically doesn’t respect it…

I like this list day thing. Expect more in the future (not all of which will be book and music related, I promise).