Link Dump

Link Dump

Well, the weekend just sorta got away from me, so here, enjoy some links culled from the depths of ye olde internets:

That’s all for now!

Link Dump

Time is short this week due to what’s know as Fat Weekend, an annual gathering of portly gentlemen that involves much merriment. For you, we’ve just got some links to tide you over:

  • Nightmare Photography – Nicolas Bruno is a photographer who suffered from sleep paralysis and started recreating his nightmares using photography, leading to some wonderfully ominous photos. There are more on his Instagram, too.
  • Finding the most depressing Radiohead song – Someone used Spotify and Lyrics Genius’ APIs to calculate a weighted average of valence (a measure of how sad a song sounds from a musical perspective) and lyrical sentiment, all to find out what the most depressing Radiohead song/album is…
  • The Myth of Apple’s Great Design – Ian Bogost challenges the conventional wisdom that Apple is great at design. Perhaps a bit too contrarian, but he does make some good points. On a personal note, the latest iPhone I got looks as great as ever, but the stupid lack of a normal headphone jack is annoying and iTunes is garbage. I mean, it’s always been garbage, but in this case, it had trouble recognizing the new phone, syncing, backing up, downloading pictures – all of these things were a disaster when the phone first came out. Some of these have been fixed by recent iOS upgrades, but it’s still janky. Now that Android’s pretty much caught up (and/or surpassed), I’m guessing my next phone will be one of those more useful devices.
  • Overwhelmed by Mutants – Interesting strategy for playing Defender:

    One day Burrell started doing something radical. He immediately shot all his humans! This was completely against the goal of the game! He didn’t even go after the aliens, and when he shot the last human, they all turned to mutants and attacked him from all sides. He glanced in my direction with a grin on his face and said “Make a mess, clean it up!” and proceeded to dodge the swarm of angry mutants noisily chasing after him. “Burrell’s not going to win this competition” I said to myself. “He’s not going to last long with a screen full of mutants!”

    Only he did. Interesting story about turning a weakness into a strength…

  • Riding Light – A 45 minute video depicting how slow light is. Of course, light is obscenely fast in terrestrial terms, but against the vastness of space, it’s awfully slow. (That’s why we need Ludicrous Speed!)
  • Why Does Your Sandwich Come With a Pickle? – The answer may shock you! Or probably not, but still a funny question.
  • Dénouement 2016 Part 1: It’s OVER! – Alright, I’m late to posting this link dump, so this two month old recap of 2016 video games from Kaedrin friend Shamus Young is a little old, but it has some nice insight on the year in general and video games in particular, like his take on VR:

    Some technological problems still haven`t been solved. For example, nobody can make a VR setup that won`t make you look like a giant dork when you`re using it.

    Nailed it.

  • Tasting Notes Through the Years – This is directed at beverage nerds (SKU is a whiskey guy, but it’s equally applicable with only minor changes to my preferred vice, beer, and I’m sure most others as well), but it’s probably broadly applicable to a lot of human endeavors.
  • 10 Halloween Urban Legends (Can You Tell Which Ones Are Real?) – Yeah, yeah, another link that would probably have been more relevant half a year ago, but still, this is a pretty great list of creepy Urban Legends…

And that’s all for now folks. Hopefully more substantial posting will resume next week…

Link Dump

As per usual, links from the depths of ye olde internets:

  • A Ridiculously Obsessive Appreciation for “Casino Royale” – Matt Patches exhaustive, scene-by-scene appreciation for the Bond reboot:

    Casino Royale scared audiences in 2006 shitless with an opening shot that bypassed the traditional gun-barrel opening. What the hell was going on? “I DID NOT JUST PAY $35 FOR TWO TICKETS, A POPCORN, AND JUNIOR MINTS TO WATCH SOME ARTSY CZECH MOVIE ABOUT PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT OR WHATEVER,” they screamed. Despite being a 50-year-old franchise, a Bond movie had yet to draw back the color palette to crisp black and white.

    Detailed, insightful, and funny. Worth a read if you love the movie (as I certainly do!)

  • This Photo Of A Naked Jai Courtney Proves That SUICIDE SQUAD Was Worth It In The End – Jai Courtney was on Conan and described this one time during the filming of Suicide Squad, he was naked and chased director David Ayer around the set. Not exactly convinced that this makes up for the movie, but it’s a step in the right direction.
  • If the Worst Suicide Squad Reviews Appeared in Its Trailer – This I agree with.
  • False Dmitry – Uh, just call me Dmitry.

That’s all for now.

Link Dump: Election

I don’t think anyone wants to hear more about the election, but no one reads this blog anyway, so you’re safe. Or, er, no that doesn’t make sense, but nothing about this election made sense, so that’s fitting. Or something. I don’t write a lot about politics anymore, and I’m not generally interested in knee-jerk analysis, but that’s all we’ve got right now. My instinct is try and understand what happened in a broad sense, and everyone is so shell-shocked right now (even the “winners”, mostly) that they’re just reverting to their previously held biases. From what I can see, almost every explanation for the election played a role. I won’t go so far as to say that there were 118 million reasons why people voted the way they did, but to pin it all on one thin explanation is also pretty foolish. Statistics failed us pretty well in this election, so I want to know more about that, and about why things are the way they are. This is easy to say for me, and others are in much worse shape, but I’m trying not to let all the anger and fear or joy and elation influence me too much.

  • Election 2016: Exit Polls – Various demographics can be interesting, but the real goofy part is that literally all of the polling up until the election was dramatically wrong, yet we’re treating these exit polls like gospel. The polling was wrong, let’s base our diagnosis of the election on more polls! Intuitively, most of these aren’t that surprising, but that’s kinda the point. Intuitively, Donalt Trump had no real chance of winning either.
  • Voter Turnout Fell, Especially In States That Clinton Won – Turnout numbers, at least, are probably more reliable. It was a douche and turd election, few seemed to actually like who they were voting for, and that generally leads to lower turnout. Yes, I know that you think the choice was clear, but the majority of Americans seemed pretty apathetic about their choices. But here I am speculating based on polling again. Oof.
  • A Running List Of Reported Racist Incidents After Donald Trump’s Victory – This shit is unacceptable. I don’t think bigotry was the main driving force behind Trump’s victory (partly because I don’t think there is a single, main driving force, but rather dozens of smaller ones), but it’s impossible to ignore this wave of xenophobic bullshit. I have not personally seen anything like this and I’m hoping that it will quickly subside, but I’ve read too many stories like this since the election. If you can do something about it, please do.
  • Louisiana student ‘fabricated’ story of hijab attack, police say – Well, shit. I’m consistently baffled by stuff like this. There’s enough genuine bullshit going around, why do you have to support those that would dismiss it by fabricating an attack?
  • Bystanders yell anti-Trump taunts as man beaten after car crash – And hey, this ain’t great either. What the hell is going on.
  • Stumped by Trump’s success? Take a drive outside US cities – A lot of stuff from before the election suddenly seems more relevant these days:

    While Trump supporters here are overwhelmingly white, their support has little to do with race (yes, you’ll always find one or two who make race the issue), but has a lot to do with a perceived loss of power.

    Not power in the way that Washington or Wall Street boardrooms view power, but power in the sense that these people see a diminishing respect for them and their ways of life, their work ethic, their tendency to not be mobile. (Many live in the same eight square miles that their father’s father’s father lived in.)

    Thirty years ago, such people determined the country’s standards in entertainment, music, food, clothing, politics, personal values. Today, they are the people who are accused of creating every social injustice imaginable; when anything in society fails, they get blamed.

    The places where they live lack economic opportunities for the next generation; they know their children and grandchildren will never experience the comfortable situations they had growing up – surrounded by family who lived next door, able to find a great job without going to college, both common traits among many successful small-business owners in the state.

    This has been a pretty common thread that I’ve seen. Many have been dismissing this view or blaming it on something other than what it is. Of course, I’m doubting that Trump can actually provide what these voters think, but its hard to dismiss their complaints. It also illustrates the divide between city and rural, which is not really new. But where there used to be at least some semblance of balance in our culture between this geographic divide, it no longer feels that way. The divide is growing. I realize it might be silly to look at horror movies for insight here, but hey, I just spent a month and a half watching them, and one thing that often pops up is the city/country divide. Carol Clover wrote about this in a chapter concerning rape-revenge films like I Spit on Your Grave and Deliverance and delved in to a more general “Urbanoia”:

    The city/country split is by no means confined to the rape-revenge film – or even revenge films in general. An enormous proportion of horror takes as its starting point the visit or move of (sub)urban people to the country. … Going from city to country in horror film is in any case very much like going from village to deep, dark forest in tradional fairy tales. … One of the obvious things at stake in the city/country split of horror films, in short, is social class – the confrontation between the haves and have-nots, or even more directly, between exploiters and their victims.

    There is, of course, lots to unpack there, and as mentioned above, this can’t explain everything, but it does seem to be a base disagreement that is driving divisions in this country. People in the city/country divide are dismissing each other with ever more vigor, and that probably plays a small part in what’s going on here.

  • To the supporters of Donald Trump – Jason Kottke wrote a bit about this in July and tied it to Tyler Cowan’s description of Brexit:

    Many Americans share a frustration of the current political system and how it is wielded against us in our name by skilled political practitioners, but I do not believe the US is a country filled with small-minded, intolerant racists, despite the perplexing level of national support for a proudly dishonest and bigoted TV personality, whatever his keen political instincts. Trump is the one lever being given to those frustrated voters for sending a message to their politicians and many are choosing to use it despite many of the reasons listed in that letter. Sending that message is more important than its potential consequences.

    This goes to the “outsider” view of the election, another common theme. Again, I doubt Trump will actually be able to deliver on what these voters actually want, but their complaints are valid. Part of the Trump win? Sure, but not all of it, which also seems to be a common theme.

  • Trump Won Because Leftist Political Correctness Inspired a Terrifying Backlash – This is another example of someone using the election to harp on one of their hobby horses, but it’s not entirely wrong either.

    If you’re a leftist reading this, you probably think that’s stupid. You probably can’t understand why someone would get so bent out of shape about being told their words are hurtful. You probably think it’s not a big deal and these people need to get over themselves. Who’s the delicate snowflake now, huh? you’re probably thinking. I’m telling you: your failure to acknowledge this miscalculation and adjust your approach has delivered the country to Trump.

    There’s a related problem: the boy-who-cried-wolf situation. I was happy to see a few liberals, like Bill Maher, owning up to it. Maher admitted during a recent show that he was wrong to treat George Bush, Mitt Romney, and John McCain like they were apocalyptic threats to the nation: it robbed him of the ability to treat Trump more seriously. The left said McCain was a racist supported by racists, it said Romney was a racist supported by racists, but when an actually racist Republican came along—and racists cheered him – it had lost its ability to credibly make that accusation.

    This is akin to the political-correctness-run-amok problem: both are examples of the left’s horrible over-reach during the Obama years. The leftist drive to enforce a progressive social vision was relentless, and it happened too fast. I don’t say this because I’m opposed to that vision – like most members of the under-30 crowd, I have no problem with gender neutral pronouns – I say this because it inspired a backlash that gave us Trump.

    Once again, I don’t think this is the only reason the country went for Trump… but it played a role.

  • A friend posted this on Facebook, and it’s well said:

    I understand that there is anger and fear right now. But, I just got through 8 years of hearing from extremely conservative friends and family about how Obama is not their president. It did not make me want to lend credibility to anything they said regarding him after that. Like it or not, Trump will be your president. Claiming otherwise is the most divisive thing you could do right now. He does not have a mandate and by all means, let there be fierce opposition to every unconstitutional and harmful policy he proposes. The important thing is to keep this country a place where you can openly criticize your president, assemble to protest your president, read about your president in the free press and where a president can be impeached if necessary and most of all, where power continues to peacefully be transferred from one president to the next one.

    Again, well said.

  • I could keep going on here, but if there’s one thing I’m trying to keep in mind, it’s that there’s no easy explanation for an election result, especially this election. Everyone who is writing about it seems to think they’ve identified that one, key component… and it just happens to conform perfectly to their worldview. Voter turnout, bigotry, third party voters, politically correct wolf-crying, city/country divide, immigration, bathrooms?, single-issue voters, capitalism/socialism, Russian influence (fucking Russia?), the list goes on and on and on. No one of these things put us where we are, but we can’t really dismiss any of them out of hand either.
  • One other thing I’ve noticed in the past few years, on both sides of the divide, is a lack of respect for free speech. I feel like it’s been constantly dismissed in the past few years in favor of [insert preferred ideology here]. Again, this goes both ways. Trump has repeatedly threatened free speech because he’s such a crybaby. Many on the left decry speech they disagree with too (you could argue that the politically correct stuff feeds into that). But now we’re really going to need free speech. This country has safeguards to protect against wannabe authoritarians, and free speech is one of them. We need to be vigilant about stuff like that. One of the reasons I’m always cautious about executive power and the expansion of federal power is that you never know who’s going to wield it next. You may have been comfortable with Bush or Obama wielding certain powers, but now Trump has them. Are you still comfortable?
  • Some bite sized nuggets from twitter:

Alright, that’s enough of that. I’m still trying to understand and none of the above is meant to dismiss or harangue anyone with unwanted advice. The only advice I have comes from Bill and Ted: Be excellent to each other. We now return you to your regularly scheduled SF/Movies programming.

Link Dump

This week sucked pretty bad for me, but these links do not, so you should enjoy them.

  • The United Federation of “hold my beer, I got this” – This thread is great, starting here:

    That Federation vessels in Star Trek seem to experience bizarre malfunctions with such overwhelming frequency isn’t just an artefact of the television serial format. Rather, it’s because the Federation as a culture are a bunch of deranged hyper-neophiles, tooling around in ships packed full of beyond-cutting-edge tech they don’t really understand. Endlessly frustrating if you have to fight them, because they can pull an effectively unlimited number of bullshit space-magic countermeasures out of their arses – but they’re as likely as not to give themselves a lethal five-dimensional wedgie in the process. All those rampant holograms and warp core malfunctions and accidentally-traveling-back-in-time incidents? That doesn’t actually happen to anyone else; it’s literally just Federation vessels that go off the rails like that. And they do so on a fairly regular basis.

    And it goes on (and on) from there. Would be kinda interesting if this became more than subtext in the upcoming show, but that’ll never happen.

  • Our 74 Most Pressing Questions About ‘Inferno’ – An interesting way to skewer yet another “They made a sequel to what?” movie, the theme of the year so far.

    9. All right, I believe you – Tom Hanks loves these movies. But, ugh, I’m sorry: It’s still weird. They’re just … not good. Why does he love them?

    Try to think of love less as the answer to a question, and more as the question to another question, itself unanswerable.

    10. For sure. Enough about Tom Hanks, though. Let’s talk about Tom Hanks’s hair. Is it still messed up?

    Yeah, it’s still messed up.

    Also: His hair is a question to another question, itself unanswerable.

  • How To Play ‘New Girl’s’ True American Drinking Game – Look, it’s not Chardee MacDennis: The Game of Games, but with the election coming up, playing this will be your solemn duty. “It’s 75% drinking, 20% Candy Land, and the floor is molten lava.”
  • Speaking of the election:

That’s all for now. Hopefully back to more productive posting soon…

Link Dump

As per usual, just a random assortment of ye olde links from the internets:

  • “Team Thor” Comic-Con Video – I heard about this a while back and thought it sounded fun; it’s finally been released, and lo, it is very fun. If you like the Marvel movies, you should watch it. Potential nominee for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form for next year? I think so.
  • Aquaman, King of the Seven Seas, Has Fucking Had It With You, Man. This will naturally become more relevant the further we get into DC movie universe land.
  • Getting to the Heart of David Letterman – Interesting nugget in this interview with David Letterman:

    DL: We did this television show – my friends and I – for a very long time. It’s probably like anyone else’s professional pursuit. When you are doing it for so long, and for each day – I have always likened it to running a restaurant—because you get response to the day’s endeavor immediately. Either from the audience or the ratings, but you know as early as the next day how you did.

    And because of this introspection, you believe that what you are doing is of great importance and that it is affecting mankind wall-to-wall. And then when you get out of it you realize, oh, well, that wasn’t true at all. (laughter) It was just silliness. And when that occurred to me, I felt so much better and I realized, geez, I don’t think I care that much about television anymore. I feel foolish for having been misguided by my own ego for so many years.

    I don’t think you need to feel foolish for working on things, but it’s a good idea to keep things in perspective. If we were all this introspective, the world’d be a better place.

  • Mary Carillo’s Badminton Rant – I went on an Olympic badminton jag on YouTube and wound up at this video which is absolutely glorious.
  • On ‘Going Away’ – It doesn’t go where you’d expect, but it’s always worth reading Julieanne Smolinski:

    When I was in junior high school, my broke single mom got her first decent paycheck and took my sister and me on a trip to a small, sparsely populated, tremendously beautiful island in the Caribbean.

    All local transport there had to be secured through a man named Scooter Dave. Scooter Dave looked like Captain Ron’s tartar-sauce stained rap sheet. I remember him telling us some suspect origin story about fleeing a dull corporate job for the island life, but he was almost certainly fleeing something more sinister. He lived in an actual beach shack and each night, could be seen at our hotel bar, spinning raunchy yarns for uneasily entertained guests while palming a miniature snifter of rum as though it were a small, shapely breast.

    Heh.

  • Why ‘Stranger Things’ worked while ‘Ben-Hur’ and ‘Ghostbusters’ went wrong – It’s not a mind-blowing sentiment, but it’s well put and apparently needs to be said since we’re drowning in uninspired remakes and sequels right now:

    “Stranger Things” was a wholly original confection, one with a pleasing synth-soundtrack aftertaste. It’s the story of a trio of boys teaming up with a little girl who has superpowers to track down a friend who has been kidnapped by a monster. And it’s the story of a mother’s love for her lost son, her refusal to give up searching for him in the face of interference (and worse) by the federal government. And it’s also the story of teenage angst, young lovers coming to grips with the desires and their responsibilities in a world that doesn’t particularly care for, or about, them.

    Sure, there are echoes of “E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial” and “It” and “The Thing” and even “Pretty in Pink” and “The Breakfast Club.” Yes, there are classic 1980s touchstones, like Dungeons & Dragons and walkie-talkies and “Evil Dead” posters and cassette mix tapes. But any sense of nostalgia “Stranger Things” inspires in viewers is healthy, earned – because it comes wrapped in an original story, one that stands on its own whether or not you ever rolled a 20-sided die or swooned over a John Hughes creation.

    Indeed. It’s hard to make a generalized statement, but I usually tend to prefer something new and interesting over a note-for-note retread. This can be done in a remake, but it hasn’t been done in most of the recent, inane remakes we’ve been inundated with lately. I don’t usually want remakes or sequels, but rather, new and interesting things that make me feel the way the originals did. Sometimes a reboot or sequel can do that, but mostly they don’t. Fortunately, there are lots of alternatives if you’re willing to hunt for them. This weekend alone, I got Hell or High Water, Don’t Breath, and Blood Father. None of those movies are perfect or even particularly great, but they’re far above the grand majority of remakes/sequels we’ve seen lately. There’s more to this idea, I think, so I’ll save that for a later post. Er, yeah, I’ll get to that sometime. Right.

And that’s all for now.

Link Dump

The joys of vacation mean that I’m still taking it easy at the moment, so enjoy these links plundered from the depths of ye olde internets:

  • The Best Time I Pretended I Hadn’t Heard of Slavoj Žižek – Glorious meditation on trolling Marxists expanded into an all-purpose method for annoying the hell out of people who like a certain class of stuff (like Steampunk!).

    The other night, I pretended I didn’t know who Slavoj Žižek, the Slovenian Hegelian Marxist and cultural critic, was. I’ve done this before, but never to such triumphant effect. This Marxist bro I was talking to made a reference to Žižek that he obviously assumed I would get, and my heart sank. He was a nice guy, actually, but I saw the conversation stretching out in front of us, and I saw myself having to say things about Žižek and listen to him say things about Žižek, and I saw that I really did not want this to happen. “This is a bar,” I wanted to say, the same way that my grandmother might have said “This is a church.” A bar is not the appropriate venue for a loud, show-offy conversation about The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology.

    Brilliant.

  • Rey is a Palpatine – J. Kenji López-Alt is probably most famous for Serious Eats, but this is a remarkably well thought out theory as to who Rey’s parents are in the new Star Wars trilogy. Spoilers, I guess, but I like this theory much better than pretty much any other speculation I’ve heard…
  • Edgar Wright’s 1000 Favorite Movies – You know I love lists, but this is pretty excessive. Still, I’ve seen a little over half of these (if my count is correct, and it’s probably not because this is a list of 1000 freakin movies; these sites should easily allow a simple click and count functionality for lists like this.) I shudder at the thought of doing a top 100 of all time, this must have been excruciating, especially once people started chiming in with the “I can’t believe you left out…” (especially when, as sometimes happens, the offending movie/director is actually on the list but the commenter didn’t notice it because there are 1000 movies on the list.)
  • A teen stripper, an arson and the case of the telltale potato – Alright, fine, I’ll read your stupid article (it turns out that the headline is more evocative than the actual story, but that’s some clickbaity headline writing)
  • How ‘Advantage Players’ Game the Casinos – We’ve all heard these stories before, but I’m a sucker for mathematicians legally taking advantage of the Casinos.
  • Wolfie’s Just Fine – A New Beginning – A pitch perfect homage to Friday the 13th, Part V: A New Beginning that gets all the little details just right. You know, for the 3 or 4 of us who actually like that movie. Also, the band’s name itself is a great little reference.
  • Ask a Manager: my best employee quit on the spot because I wouldn’t let her go to her college graduation – Dear lord, the person who wrote this letter is the worst. Great response by the column writer.

And that should do it for now…

Link Dump: Peakquel Edition

A rash of articles this week examine the lackluster performance of many recently released sequels, which is interesting speculation but perhaps feature a bit too much hand wringing. Movies can be “successful” because of many factors. We all like to think that quality has something to do with it, and it probably does, but not as much as we’d think. Luck undoubtedly plays a part. Marketing can get people into theaters and goose the numbers, but it generally doesn’t get people to like the movie. Look, this isn’t quantum physics, a movie’s success isn’t just the sum of metrics describing it. Plenty of movies make lots of money, but that doesn’t mean people actually want to see more. Indeed, they might have hated the movie, such that when the inevitable sequel comes out, they stay away. Ultimately, on a long enough timeline, bad movies get their just desserts.

  • Hollywood’s New Problem: Sequels Moviegoers Don’t Want – The article that kicked off the discussion:

    “Sequels of late have fallen on rough times. The tried-and-true formulas and familiar characters and themes that are the cornerstone of the modern sequel have acted as a de facto life insurance policy against box-office failure,” says box-office analyst Paul Dergarabedian. “However, 2016 has proven to be a very tough battleground, and the landscape has been littered with a series of sequels that have come up short, and thus call into question the entire notion of the inherent appeal of non-original, franchise-based content.”

    Which is funny, because don’t we so often hear about original content being not so appealing? Indeed, this year hasn’t seen a particularly great performance, even from quality films like The Nice Guys.

  • Have we finally reached peak sequel? asks Matt Singer, who would eventually discuss “peakquel” on twitter and turned the discussion towards “event” based movies:

    American movies in 2016 are all about creating events, movies so “important” that they can’t be missed (or, more specifically, that they can’t be put off until they show up on cable or streaming services). But how much of an event can something be if it’s the sixth installment in a series that seemingly has no planned ending?

    …But events are unique; that’s what makes them events. Hollywood now tries to position so many sequels as events, that they’ve inadvertently diluted their primary selling point. When everything is an event, nothing is an event – and when a franchise has no end in sight each individual installment is inherently less unique, because there will always be more where that came from.

    This is quite true. One of the successful things about Captain America: Civil War was that the fate of the entire planet didn’t really hinge on a giant laser beam into the sky, but rather a personal battle between two friends. Meanwhile, X-Men: Apocalypse feints towards the literal end of the world, and audiences mostly just yawn.

  • Maybe Audiences Want Sagas, Not Sequels – Devin Faraci has an interesting spin, but it basically just amounts to the need for a sequel to be good and worthwhile, not just a shameless retread. Still worth thinking about though:

    As Hollywood studios chase guaranteed box office they need to understand that audiences recognize when a movie has been made as a shitty cash grab or, in the case of Neighbors 2, they’re cynical when it looks like it might have been a shitty cash grab. Audiences want to feel like a sequel has a reason to exist. On the other hand understanding that too much leads to a peculiar phenomenon where the first movie is just a set up for a trilogy or something, leaving audiences unsatisfied. The key is to create a complete movie experience with one eye on the future. That’s the lesson nobody’s taking from Marvel.

    Also worth noting that Marvel’s source material is already serialized in nature. I think that’s a key part of Superhero movie success, though it can often collapse in on itself when filmmakers become too ambitious and try to cram too much into one film. Marvel has done this from time to time, but seems to have largely escaped the normal fate that befalls such a film…

And that’s all for now. Stay tuned for the sequel link dump next week. Or not.

Link Dump

As per usual, just some links from the depths of ye olde internets:

And that’s all for now…

Link Dump

Time is short, so we shall venture into yonder internets in search of interesting linkys for you to follow:

  • Patrolling Disputed Waters, U.S. and China Jockey for Dominance – Interesting article on the interactions between the U.S. and Chinese Navies, worth reading just for the highly coded and exceedingly polite exchanges between Naval ships like this:

    …so began an elaborate diplomatic dance.

    “This is U.S. Warship 62. Good morning, sir. It is a pleasant day at sea, over.”

    No response.

    “This is U.S. Warship 62. Good morning, sir. It is a pleasant day to be at sea, over.”

    Still no response.

    Captain Renshaw turned to Ensign Li. “You’re up,” he said. “They can’t pretend they don’t speak Chinese.”

    “Chinese Warship 575, this is U.S. Warship 62,” Ensign Li said in Chinese. “Today is a sunny day for a sea voyage, over.”

    …Suddenly, the radio crackled again as the frigate responded in Chinese: “U.S. Warship 62, this is Chinese Warship 575. Today’s weather is great. It is a pleasure to meet you at sea.”

    Ensign Li responded, also in Chinese: “This is U.S. Warship 62. The weather is indeed great. It is a pleasure to meet you, too, over.”

    Preliminaries dispensed with, the Chinese ship got down to business, switching to English. “How long have you been since departing from your home port? Over.”

    Captain Renshaw was immediately shaking his head. “No, we’re not answering that. I would never ask him that.”

    Ensign Giancana picked up the radio again. “Chinese Warship 575, this is U.S. Navy Warship 62. We do not talk about our schedules. But we are enjoying our time at sea, over.”

    And it goes on from there, excellent.

  • The Memory Palace: Jackie the MGM Lion – You’ve seen her roar a lot, this is the story behind MGM’s infamous lion.
  • Keanu shredding with Taran Butler in preparation for what is sure to be another cinematic masterpiece, John Wick 2.
  • Can you fold paper more than 7 times with hydraulic press – Maybe, but it sorta ceases to be paper at that point…
  • A Wannabe Supervillain Built His Own Thermite Cannon – Because of course.
  • Outrageous Oliver Reed Interview on Late Night (1987) – And I thought today’s celebrities were crazy.

And that’s all for now!