<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Kaedrin Weblog</title>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/</link>
<description>Thoughts and ramblings on culture, movies, politics and more; updated every Sunday.</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:28:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=5.12</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>SF Book Review, Part 11: The Vorkosigan Saga Ends</title>
<description><![CDATA[The last time <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002109.html">I wrote about the Vorkosigan Saga books</a>, a commenter noted that the best books were ahead of me, and indeed, I think they were.  In fact, the run of books starting with <em>Mirror Dance</em> and concluding with <em>A Civil Campaign</em> is as good as any series I've ever read, and the series as a whole represents quite a feat. It is not so bogged down with continuity that you have to read all of them - most of the novels are complete stories in and of themselves. But on the other hand, when you read them in order (as I have done), a lot of value is added.  This makes some of these later books in the series difficult to judge.  <em>Memory</em> might be my favorite novel in the series, but is that because of what happens in the novel by itself, or is it reliant on previous installments for that heft? And is that a bad thing? Personally, I don't think so... but it may make an interesting topic for another post.
<br><br>
Below are short reviews of the last five novels of the series (with a bonus short story thrown in for good measure).  I've tried to avoid any real talk about the plots of each, but there might be some minor spoilers on a macro level.  That being said, I knew a lot of this stuff was coming before I read it, and it did not diminish anything.  Half the fun is Bujold's style, which is not ornate or flowery, not <em>showy</em>, but perhaps deceptively effective and downright compelling.  These are page turners, but ones of unusual sophistication. While I have finished the series, I don't think this will be the last I blog of it.  Indeed, I already have a few ideas for other posts, but they will have to wait for another day.  In the meantime, here's some mixed thoughts on the last five books of the series:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/067187845X/kaedrin">Memory</a> - I think this may be my favorite novel of the series. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have nearly the same impact if you started here.  This book is a culmination, a real turning point for both the character of Miles and the series as a whole.  Up until now, Miles has led a dual life, and for the most part, he's gotten away with it.  But the chickens come home to roost in this novel, and Miles has to make some hard choices.  Like all the best Vorkosigan novels, seemingly nothing goes right in the first portion of the story.  I keep thinking to myself: <em>This is wrong!</em> Or <em>No, you idiot!</em>  Fortunately, Bujold knows what she's doing. Miles falters in the beginning, but starts to pick himself back up, and watching him grow, watching him finally accept and acknowledge his identity, his true identity, makes for a wonderful story (this is primarily why new readers might not wholly get it).  Oh sure, there's lots of intrigue and conspiracy and of course Miles is in the center of it all, but that's the norm for him.  What's new is that he doesn't retreat to his normal crutches (er, not after the beginning anyway), and instead forges a new path for himself.  
<br><br>
Also notable here is the setting of Barrayar, which becomes more complex and real to me every time I see it. Sometimes it seems like every science fiction planet has their own monoculture (or monoclimate), but Barrayar is fully realized, with distinct differences between rural and city areas, and multiple political factions, etc... It helps that the planet is populated with a veritable plethora of familiar and likeable side characters (another reason the book probably wouldn't resonate with new readers). In particular, it's fun to see a different side of Illyan, who up until now has been something of an inscrutable spymaster (though we do see him when he's much younger too). There's even a callback to my other favorite Vorkosigan story, <em>The Mountains of Morning</em> - Miles visits Silvy Vale again, to find that things have changed there, in no small part because of his previous efforts.  It's a turning point for Miles in this story, and thus a turning point for the whole series.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671578081/kaedrin">Komarr</a> - In this book, Miles and one of the Emperor's other Imperial Auditors visits one of the other two planets in the Barrayaran Imperium to investigate an engineering disaster.  It looks pretty straightforward at first, but seeing as though Miles is involved, things get hairy pretty quickly.  There are a few things that really set this book apart, and one is that half the book is written from Ekaterin Vorsoisson's perspective.  She's the niece of Miles' Imperial Auditor colleague, and she's married to a minor Vor lord and administrator on the planet.  This is a relatively new direction for the series, which has often relied on Miles as detective, but this time, it's his official role.  I won't say much about the mystery in question, except that it's pretty well plotted and interesting.  The real strength of this book is Ekaterin, who's in a pretty rough situation, and things get worse for her as time goes on.  Miles and Ekaterin actually develop an interesting relationship here, and there's a moment about halfway through the book where they have a minor adventure when shopping, and it forces Miles to have  flashback to his Dendarii days - it's actually a callback to one of the novellas from <em>Borders of Infinity</em>, and it totally explains something that I never quite got when I was reading that story.  It's one of those moments when all the pieces unexpectedly come together... for something you never even realized was an issue.  It makes me wonder about the degree to which Bujold had planned out the series.  In any case, this is an interesting book.  I wouldn't say that it's better than Memory, but it's solid in its own right, and it's an interesting direction for the series.  Miles is still growing into his new role, and finding that his Impsec habits die hard (and that's a good thing, too, as his many varied experiences serve him well in his new job). </li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671578855/kaedrin">A Civil Campaign</a> - You wouldn't think a book whose centerpiece is a (disastrous) dinner party would have very high stakes, but, well, here we are.  Oh, and the conclusion of the story hinges off of... a democratic vote.  Yeah, from the outside, this doesn't seem like much, especially in a series that has previously centered on military action and espionage, but it's actually quite involving because it's a big character piece.  The points of view in this book expand from Miles and Ekaterin to also include Mark Vorkosigan, Kareen Koudelka, and even Ivan Vorpatril.  Like Memory, we're on Barrayar here, so there's a huge cast of well established side characters making appearances, along with a bevy of new ones, including even some folk of the Vorrutyer clan who have been villains in previous books, but this time around, there are a couple that are, uh, maybe not good guys, but certainly better than the alternatives!  It's another change of pace for the series, and the Romantic angle which has been building since Memory seems to have picked up a lot of steam.  The books starts a bit on the slow side, but once you get to that ill-fated dinner party, which is hysterically funny by the way, things pick up considerably, making this among my favorite of the books in the series. Actually, the grand majority of the book is funny, probably making this more of a comedy than previous books in the series.  Where Memory was all about Miles, this book seems more about Ekaterin.  Her character underwent a lot of changes in <em>Komarr</em> too, but she's really the one that is driving everything this time around.  This book really does a lot, but Bujold manages to juggle all the various storylines well, and make it all seem natural and balanced.  Excellent book.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B004I6CZ28/kaedrin">Winterfair Gifts</a> - This is a short story that depicts Miles' wedding on Barrayar.  The Dendarii mercenaries (sans Elli Quinn, for obvious reasons) have arrived for the wedding, but Lady Ekaterin has mysteriously fallen ill... The story is told entirely from Armsman Roic's POV, which is a neat touch. We've seen him a bit in the previous novel, but he really gets a chance to shine here.  Indeed, there's even something of a romantic subplot with him and Taura, the 8 foot tall, genetically modified Dendarii mercenary with fierce, catlike features.  Roic, being a Barrayaran, has a prejudice against women soldiers and "mutants", of which Taura certainly qualifies.  But he quickly reverses position.  It's not really the focus of the story, and it was pretty clear that nothing much would come of this because of Taura's unnaturally short lifespan, but it was a nice touch.  The mystery the two of them solve is pretty neato too.  All in all, it's a really pleasant story, and it was really nice to get updates on the Dendarii folk, who had been pretty absent from the recent books.  If you're reading the series, don't skip this one because it's "just" a short story.  It's a lot of fun. </li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743436121/kaedrin">Diplomatic Immunity</a> - As I tweeted when I was reading this, I tried really hard to resist the "urge to constantly scream the title like the South African guy from <em>Lethal Weapon 2</em>". Of course, I failed miserably, and yes, I just kinda screamed it right now.  Anywho, after the previous four books in the series, which were all superb, I think this one probably represents a bit of step backwards. Not bad at all, just not quite at the level of the previous few books.  It does take a little while to get started, but once the nature of the conflict starts to become clear, it becomes incredibly tense and thrilling.  Unfortunately, a fair amount of the conclusion happens "off screen" as it were, and we find out that Ekaterin saves the day in Miles' stead (I'd like to have seem more from Ekaterin's perspective in this one).  On the other hand, we do get to hang out with Bel Thorne again, which is awesome, and Bujold's writing is still wonderful and absurdly funny at times.  I don't want to talk much about the plot here, as it is interesting (you'll probably have to have read Cetaganda before this one for the ending to really have a good impact) and despite not being my favorite Vorkosigan book, it's still better than average SF mystery! It's one of those weird things.  Miles manages to foil a galaxy-wide conspiracy plot that could have potentially lead to war... yet it seems like there is less at stake here than in <em>A Civil Campaign</em>! </li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1451637500/kaedrin">Cryoburn</a> - Like <em>Diplomatic Immunity</em>, this one suffers a bit from reduced stakes.  Bujold manages to work around this by adding the POV of Jin, an 11 year old kid at the heart of the conspiracy that Miles is uncovering.  But the book takes place on Kibou-daini, a planet that we've never heard of before (most of the other planets in Bujold's universe are mentioned and foreshadowed in other books before a story gets set there), and the only familiar face we run into is Armsman Roic (who is indeed awesome!)  A few others show up later in the story, and we see some communiques from Ekaterin and Gregor and the like, and we hear a little about Miles' kids, but for the most part, it's all new characters.  Fortunately, the new folks are pretty great in their own right, and the story here is also rather interesting, which I think elevates this above <em>Diplomatic Immunity</em>, even if it doesn't quite reach the heights of some other installments.  Ironically, despite being the latest novel published (and the latest in terms of the chronology), this might make a decent entry into the series, which is rather strange, and of course, everything you'd read after this would be prequel, so I wouldn't recommend it, but I suspect that's why this managed to garner a Hugo nomination... Anyway, I had a ton of fun with this, but there was something about it that felt strange.  Not bad, but it's like Miles has become so powerful in his old age.  He's done all the growth he's needed to do.  It's like he's maxed out his levels in an RPG and so most enemies don't really represent a threat to him... so while I enjoyed the story, I never quite feared that he wouldn't manage to pull it all off in style, which, of course, he does.  There's nothing really wrong with that, and again, I really had a lot of fun with the book, it's just another that isn't really top tier stuff (though Bujold's writing is tight as ever). The very end of <em>Cryoburn</em>, after the story proper has been resolved, seems a bit rushed for what it represents.  There's a bit of a tragedy there, but not an unexpected one, and indeed, Bujold laid the hints on pretty thickly in the preceding chapters, though I didn't quite recognize that for what it was. It makes for a fitting end to the series, though I'm sure there are plenty other stories that could be told as well (and indeed, Bujold has written a tale centering around Ivan that will be out later this year).</li>
</ul>
Whew.  There are only two books in the series that remain for me, one that takes place a couple hundred years in the past and is mostly unrelated (<em>Falling Free</em>) and one that is forthcoming (<em>Captain Vorpatril's Alliance</em>, which can't get here soon enough - I think withdrawal pains are starting to set in already).]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002321.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002321.html</guid>
<category>Science Fiction</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:28:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Link Dump</title>
<description><![CDATA[Is it time for more links? Yes, I think it is.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8gJOCwBuFc">Magic Burger Crystals</a> - Amazingly weird but fascinating video depicting a product with a bunch of plastic molds and packets of crystals.  If you follow the instructions, you end up with a tiny meal - two burgers, some fries, and a soda. I'm not sure how comfortable I'd be eating a burger (including bun and cheese) that was grown out of microwaved wet crystals, but apparently it is edible and tastes like a real burger. It is, of course, from Japan. (via <a href="http://chizumatic.mee.nu/">Chizumatic</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2012/04/more-on-drm-and-ebooks.html">More on DRM and ebooks</a> - After Charlie Stross's last musings on ebooks, in which he recommended that publishers remove DRM in order to compete with Amazon's monopolistic position in the market, it seems that <a href="http://www.tor.com/blogs/2012/04/torforge-e-book-titles-to-go-drm-free">Tor books announced</a> that they will be removing DRM in order to compete with Amazon's monopolistic position in the market. Ok, they didn't actually say that, but it was an encouraging move, and Stross goes into some more detail about DRM and ebooks.  As always, an interesting read.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/04/biometric_passp_1.html">Biometric Passports Make it Harder for Undercover CIA Officers</a> - An interesting and probably unintentional effect of requiring biometrics when people enter your country. Technologies like iris scanners are cleaner than fingerprints, and they work faster, and they hurt spycraft: "For a clandestine field operative, flying under a false name could be a one-way ticket to a headquarters desk, since they're irrevocably chained to whatever name and passport they used." Huh.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/22/sports/football/jets-trevor-pryce-is-retired-and-getting-tired-of-it.html?_r=3">In Comfortable Retirement, and Getting Tired of It</a> - Trevor Pryce played in the NFL for 14 years.  He's now 36 years old and retired. And bored.  I always wondered what these folks do after their (usually shorter than 14 year) career has ended, and I guess this is the answer. I also wonder if I would fall into the same category if I were to retire in a couple of years.  My fear is that I'd be a little like Peter from <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0151804/' title='IMDB: Office Space'>Office Space</a> and be happy doing nothing. I suspect I'd figure something out though.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6763677/wanderlunch-we-sent-a-guy-to-dubai-just-to-eat-pizza-huts-crown-crust-carnival-cheeseburger-pizza">Wanderlunch</a> - College Humor sent someone to Dubai so they could eat that disgusting looking Pizza Hut thing with mini cheeseburgers in it. I don't know whether to applaud this or do a facepalm.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.reelizer.com/category/concept/">Alternate Movie Posters</a> - Most of these are really beautiful, <a href="http://www.mondotees.com/">Mondo</a>-quality posters.</li>
</ul>
That's all for now...]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002315.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002315.html</guid>
<category>Link Dump</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:09:50 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sister Clodagh&apos;s Superficially Spiritual, Ambitiously Agnostic Last-Rites-of-Spring Movie Quiz</title>
<description><![CDATA[Dennis Cozzalio of the Sergio Leone and the Infield Fly Rule blog has <a href="http://sergioleoneifr.blogspot.com/2012/04/sister-clodaghs-superficially-spiritual.html">posted another of his famous movie quizes</a>, and as always, I'm excited to provide my answers.  Previous installments answering questions from <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001920.html">Professor Hubert Farnsworth</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001854.html">David Huxley</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001810.html">Professor Fate</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001740.html">Professor Russell Johnson</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001524.html">Dr. Smith</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001631.html">Professor Peabody</a>,  <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001668.html">Professor Severus Snape</a>, <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002031.html">Professor Ed Avery</a>, and <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002137.html">Dr. Anton Phibes</a>, are also available...  This time around, Sister Superior Clodagh "has fashioned a quiz organized loosely around themes of religious belief and representation in the movies", which, now that I think about it, isn't a particular specialty to me. Perhaps it's my 16 years of Catholic schooling (and exposure to actual nuns) that has caused me to neglect religious filmmaking, or maybe it's because most films examining religion aren't particularly sympathetic.  Whatever the case, here are my answer's to Sister Clodagh's quiz:
<br><br>
<em>1) Favorite movie featuring nuns</em>
<br><br>
I had a tough go on this one.  There are a lot of movies with nuns, but few where the nuns are actually prominent characters.  My first thought went to <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0065134/' title='IMDB: Two Mules for Sister Sara'>Two Mules for Sister Sara</a>, a movie I don't even remember that well, except that I remember enough to know that it doesn't really qualify for this question... I've actually not seen this quiz's namesake in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039192/' title='IMDB: Black Narcissus'>Black Narcissus</a>, so that's a no go.  Looking at the other answers at SLIFR, I see one that works for me though: Sister Mary Stigmata (a.k.a. The Penguin) in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/' title='IMDB: The Blues Brothers'>The Blues Brothers</a>.  The nuns I've come into contact with never contained mystical powers, nor did they smack their students with rulers, but I grew up in the namby pamby 80s.  I've heard stories, though. (Oh, and in the course of one of the other questions below, I found <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112818/' title='IMDB: Dead Man Walking'>Dead Man Walking</a> - which is a great movie featuring nuns... among other things.)
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/misc/bbpenguin.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/misc/bbpenguin_sm.jpg" alt="The Penguin" border="0"></a>
</div>
<em>2) Second favorite John Frankenheimer movie</em>
<br><br>
I'll go with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0122690/' title='IMDB: Ronin'>Ronin</a> (with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056218/' title='IMDB: The Manchurian Candidate'>The Manchurian Candidate</a> being my favorite), but while I've seen at least 5 or 6 other Frankenheimer movies, I probably should also take a look at <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058576/' title='IMDB: Seven Days in May'>Seven Days in May</a> and <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060955/' title='IMDB: Seconds'>Seconds</a> (which would be the punniest answer to this question, tee hee).
<br><br>
<em>3) William Bendix or Scott Brady?</em>
<br><br>
Hell, I don't really know who either of these people are... But looking at their filmography, I see that Scott Brady was in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087363/' title='IMDB: Gremlins'>Gremlins</a>, which is pretty awesome. Then again, I can't even picture him in that and William Bendix is in a few movies I'd like to catch up with at some point: Hitchcock's <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037017/' title='IMDB: Lifeboat'>Lifeboat</a> and William Wyler's <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043465/' title='IMDB: Detective Story'>Detective Story</a>.  But not having seen those movies, I guess this one goes to Brady on a technicality.
<br><br>
<em>4) What movie, real or imagined, would you stand in line six hours to see? Have you ever done so in real life?</em>
<br><br>
I have certainly never done so in real life (though I do seem to recall a huge line stretching around the block for <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086190/' title='IMDB: Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi'>Return of the Jedi</a> in my youth... I don't remember how long it took to get in, but I'd be surprised if it was six hours). At this point in my life, I can't imagine doing that for simple entertainment purposes - heck, I get annoyed when I have to wait more than a minute or two to buy a ticket these days.  But I suppose that if someone invents a movie that will confer some sort of powers (or immortality or something) to its audience, I'd be willing to wait the six hours for that.  I'm not holding my breath though.
<br><br>
<em>5) Favorite Mitchell Leisen movie</em>
<br><br>
I can't say as though I've seen any of his movies, though perhaps I have seen an episode of The Twilight Zone that he directed (if so, I have no remembrance of it).  I have done an exhaustive ten-second analysis of his filmography though, and shall thus declare <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0025037/' title='IMDB: Death Takes a Holiday'>Death Takes a Holiday</a> a movie that interests me. So there.
<br><br>
<em>6) Ann Savage or Peggy Cummins?</em>
<br><br>
Peggy Cummins, because I've actually seen movies that she's in... and I even recognized her name.  Poor Ann Savage... but it's hard to compete with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0042530/' title='IMDB: Gun Crazy'>Gun Crazy</a> and <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050766/' title='IMDB: Curse of the Demon'>Curse of the Demon</a>.
<br><br>
<em>7) First movie you remember seeing as a child</em>
<br><br>
As if I needed a reason to question the reliability of human memory, this question hurts.  The first movie that jumped into my head was <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/' title='IMDB: The Terminator'>The Terminator</a>, but that came out way too late to be my first movie, and I know I've seen others before it.  As previously mentioned, I remember the line for <em>Return of the Jedi</em>, but my memories of that showing must have been superseded by the dozens of other times I've watched that movie. I do remember watching <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033563/' title='IMDB: Dumbo'>Dumbo</a> at some point.  I have no idea how old I was at the time, but I'd put that at around 4 years old, as that age is where my mind points to as containing the first real, concrete memories (including a distinct memory of asking how old I was - I may have done that before, but I was 4 years old when I started actually keeping track of my age).
<br><br>
<em>8) What moment in a movie that is not a horror movie made you want to bolt from the theater screaming?</em>
<br><br>
I can't say as though I've ever wanted to do that.  I can only remember walking out on a movie once, for <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114614/' title='IMDB: Tank Girl'>Tank Girl</a>, which was emphatically not what I wanted to watch at the time.  I do remember getting sick in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1060277/' title='IMDB: Cloverfield'>Cloverfield</a> - and I'm not typically prone to motion sickness either - but instead of bolting from the theater screaming, I simply closed my eyes until my body was able to establish some sort of equilibrium.
<br><br>
<em>9) Richard Widmark or Robert Mitchum?</em>
<br><br>
Robert Mitchum, hands down.  I mean <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048424/' title='IMDB: The Night of the Hunter'>The Night of the Hunter</a>, <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055824/' title='IMDB: Cape Fear'>Cape Fear</a> (<a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0101540/' title='IMDB: Cape Fear'>both of 'em</a>), and <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039689/' title='IMDB: IMDb - Out of the Past'>Out of the Past</a>... heck, even <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096061/' title='IMDB: Scrooged'>Scrooged</a>.  Tough to compete with Mitchum's filmography.
<br><br>
<em>10) Best movie Jesus</em>
<br><br>
This is a tough one, as most of the obvious choices are from movies that I'm not that big a fan of... I honestly can't think of a truly great performance as Jesus.  Dafoe's Jesus is pretty good, I guess, except that's not really the Jesus I know. I've never seen Sydow in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059245/' title='IMDB: The Greatest Story Ever Told'>The Greatest Story Ever Told</a>, and from what I hear, the movie ain't particularly good (though he's apparently good in it).  Honestly, the best answer I've seen for this one is John Turturro from <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/' title='IMDB: The Big Lebowski'>The Big Lebowski</a>....
<br><br>
<em>11) Silliest straight horror film that you're still fond of</em>
<br><br>
There are probably dozens of answers I could give here, as I tend to enjoy silly horror films, but the only real possible answer for me is <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079714/' title='IMDB: Phantasm'>Phantasm</a>. Granted, I does still strike a nerve at moments and can be genuinely compelling, but it's low budget and horrible acting sometimes make the film laughable.  In particular, the sequence where the Tall Man's finger turns into a bug is a masterpiece of silly cinema. It's a movie that I've always loved though, perhaps because it is earnest, but silly.
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/misc/phantasm01.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/misc/phantasm01_sm.jpg" alt="The Penguin" border="0"></a><br><em>Greatest Special Effects Ever</em>
</div>
<em>12) Emily Blunt or Sally Gray?</em>
<br><br>
Emily Blunt by default, as I've actually seen movies she's in.  This is mildly unfair though, as I'm much more familiar with the filmic period of Blunt than the filmic period of Gray (who was most active in the 30s and 40s).  
<br><br>
<em>13) Favorite cinematic Biblical spectacular</em>
<br><br>
<a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052618/' title='IMDB: Ben-Hur'>Ben-Hur</a>, hands down my favorite Biblican spectacular, probably because it only touches on the Bible peripherally.  Most of the other Biblical epics struggle to compete with the minds eye from having read the Bible from a young age. Ben-Hur is based on a novel and had multiple film adaptations before the Charlton Heston, William Wyler take that I love so much, but it still feels like an "original" story, something I value more and more in these days of remakes and marketing-driven films.
<br><br>
<em>14) Favorite cinematic moment of unintentional humor</em>
<br><br>
The obvious answer is the "I hate sand" monologue from <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0121765/' title='IMDB: Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones'>Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones</a>, but I wasn't really laughing at the time because I actually wanted those movies to be good.  I don't really have a list of unintentionally hilarious cinematic moments, but I could probably come up with hundreds of examples if given enough time.  Another few that just came to me: several moments in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0949731/' title='IMDB: The Happening'>The Happening</a> are just cringe inducingly funny (I'm thinking about the scene where Marky Mark pleads with his students to care about the bees, or the scene where he tells this completely off-the-wall story about how he went to a pharmacist or something), and then there's the scene where Miles Dyson dies in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103064/' title='IMDB: Terminator 2: Judgment Day'>Terminator 2: Judgment Day</a>, which is just hysterically funny in a moment that is supposed to be deadly serious.
<br><br>
<em>15) Michael Fassbender or David Farrar?</em>
<br><br>
Michael Fassbender, though again, we're hit with two different time periods, and I'm much more familiar with Fassbender's work than Farrar's... Also, Fassbender is pretty fucking awesome.
<br><br>
<em>16) Most effective faith-affirming movie</em>
<br><br>
I had a hard time with this, then the ideas just kept pouring through to the point where I can't pick a favorite.  I'll start with a pair of Christmas classics: <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038650/' title='IMDB: It's a Wonderful Life'>It's a Wonderful Life</a> and <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039628/' title='IMDB: Miracle on 34th Street'>Miracle on 34th Street</a>, then move to more modern times with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097351/' title='IMDB: Field of Dreams'>Field of Dreams</a> and one that I saw in the SLIFR thread that I would have never thought of, but which fits: <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107048/' title='IMDB: Groundhog Day'>Groundhog Day</a>.
<br><br>
<em>17) Movie that makes the best case for agnosticism</em>
<br><br>
People seem to take different stances on agnosticism, so this question will definitely provoke different sorts of answers depending on how you define agnosticism.  Some think it's all about doubting or questioning the existence of a deity, and their answers indicate such (including snarky ones like "anything directed by Michael Bay makes me question the existence of a god").  Personally, I tend towards the notion that agnosticism is really about the difference between belief and knowledge - I think we are all agnostics of a sort, even if we call ourselves Christian or athiest or Muslim or whatever.  The movie that comes to mind here is <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118884/' title='IMDB: Contact'>Contact</a>, which explores the subject at angles. I don't think the movie is perfect and some aspects haven't held up as well as I'd like, but I do love the conflict at the heart of the story.  Science versus religion, fact versus faith, knowledge versus belief.  I have not read the book, and from what I understand, the film stops short.  But judging on the film itself, I think it makes a certain sorta sense that aligns with a lot of my feelings on the myriad subjects tackled. In essence, I don't see the conflicts described as being all that conflicting.  Science and religion sometimes struggle with the same questions, but their approaches are so fundamentally different, and the questions so impenetrable and that I think both are necessary...
<br><br>
<em>18) Favorite song and/or dance sequence from a musical</em>
<br><br>
I generally hate musicals, so I have no idea, but I'll choose the most obscure thing that comes to mind, which is a song from <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1355599/' title='IMDB: IMDb - Stingray Sam'>Stingray Sam</a> that consists mostly of the two parents' names and their offspring's name, which is a portmanteau of the parents' names - for example, Fredrick and Edward produced Fredward.  It's a brilliant song.  Here, watch it:<br><br>
<div style="text-align: center;"><iframe width="400" height="233" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PNhXYmJ0G8c" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>
<br><br>
<em>19) Third favorite Howard Hawks movie</em>
<br><br>
<a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038355/' title='IMDB: The Big Sleep'>The Big Sleep</a>, with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032599/' title='IMDB: IMDb - His Girl Friday'>His Girl Friday</a> being my favorite, and <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053221/' title='IMDB: Rio Bravo'>Rio Bravo</a> being my second favorite.  In all honesty, the answer could be any of those three, depending on my mood, as I love them all.  I also have an affection for <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034167/' title='IMDB: Sergeant York'>Sergeant York</a>, but that's a more sentimental and personal thing...
<br><br>
<em>20) Clara Bow or Jean Harlow?</em>
<br><br>
I'm going to have to take a mulligan here, as I'm not really that familiar with these actresses' filmographies.  I've frequently observed that I need to get better acquainted with the silent era, though I've not made much progress in that direction.
<br><br>
<em>21) Movie most recently seen in the theater? On DVD/Blu-ray/Streaming?</em>
<br><br>
Most recently seen in the theater was <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1259521/' title='IMDB: The Cabin in the Woods'>The Cabin in the Woods</a> (which <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002300.html">I loved</a>), though after tonight, it will be <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/' title='IMDB: The Avengers'>The Avengers</a>.  On Blu-Ray, it was <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0905372/' title='IMDB: The Thing'>The Thing</a> remake/prequel/reboot thing (pun intended) that strikes me as being an object lesson in how CGI effects are inferior to practical effects.  Also, it was a fine, but pretty unnecessary movie that doesn't really come close to the classic Carpenter version. On streaming, it was <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1623757/' title='IMDB: Machete Maidens Unleashed!'>Machete Maidens Unleashed!</a>, a documentary about the Filipino exploitation scene in the 60s and 70s (this will come up later in the quiz).
<br><br>
<em>22) Most unlikely good movie about religion</em>
<br><br>
I have not seen <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079470/' title='IMDB: Life of Brian'>Life of Brian</a> in many years and thus don't remember much about it other than it was funny and surprisingly thoughtful.
<br><br>
<em>23) Phil Silvers or Red Skelton?</em>
<br><br>
Yeah, so I don't really know either of these guys. Skelton sticks out in my head, but I don't really know his filmography that well.  And Phil Silvers was in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057193/' title='IMDB: It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World'>It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World</a>, which I remember enjoying despite the fact that it's a bit overlong.
<br><br>
<em>24) "Favorite" Hollywood scandal </em>
<br><br>
Not much of a scandal follower myself, so I can't really think of many, except perhaps the Hollywood blacklist stuff, but even then, I'm not too interested in that sort of thing. I'd rather watch movies than gossip about actors and actresses, thanks.
<br><br>
<em>25) Best religious movie (non-Christian)</em>
<br><br>
This was surprisingly difficult, as most every religious movie I've seen seems to involve Christianity in some way or another.  <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070917/' title='IMDB: The Wicker Man'>The Wicker Man</a> came to mind, but that's not really a serious exploration of paganism, and much of it is played off of the Christian leanings of the main character.  <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1019452/' title='IMDB: A Serious Man'>A Serious Man</a> is a great movie and it's got a lot to say about Judaism.  I've got to give credit to the guy who answered <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0036027/' title='IMDB: I Walked with a Zombie'>I Walked with a Zombie</a>, which also brings to mind <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096071/' title='IMDB: The Serpent and the Rainbow'>The Serpent and the Rainbow</a>, both of which (superficially) involve Voodoo. It's been so long since I've seen <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083987/' title='IMDB: Gandhi'>Gandhi</a> that I'm not sure how religious it really was... Jeeze, this question is harder than it should be.
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/wicker/wicker2.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/wicker/wicker2_sm.jpg" alt="The Wicker Man" border="0"></a>
</div>
<em>26) The King of Cinema: King Vidor, King Hu or Henry King? (Thanks, Peter)</em>
<br><br>
Erm, yeah, once again I'm not terribly familiar with any of their work, but I'll go with King Hu for his work with the Shaw Brothers and his work on Wuxia Pian pictures.
<br><br>
<em>27) Name something modern movies need to relearn how to do that American or foreign classics had down pat </em>
<br><br>
This is a deceptively difficult question to answer, but I'll say dialogue, writing in general, and originality would be welcome in modern movies.  Hollywood seems to be stuck in this weird marketing mindset which says that movies can't be successful unless they're based on an existing property.  Hence the recent spate of remakes and reboots, along with the trend towards franchises that's been on the march for several decades now.  It's not so much that this stuff is inherently bad as that it's seemingly pervasive these days, to the point where Hollywood is putting out movies based on <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1440129/">board games</a> (which I'd honestly not mind if they actually went out of their way to hire someone talented to write an interesting story - I'd love to see that sort of thing flourish, but from what I've seen, that ain't happening).  Conversely, American independent cinema is running too far in the opposite direction, making unpalatable, aggressively insular, "personal" films that are often actively hostile to their audience. That sort of middle-ground where movies can be entertaining but still very good seems to have been lost.
<br><br>
<em>28) Least favorite Federico Fellini movie</em>
<br><br>
Shocking confession: I've never actually seen a Federico Fellini movie.  I should probably get off my butt and see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056801/">8&frac12;</a>, but I've heard so much about that movie and despite the praise, it never sounds even remotely interesting to me. Ditto for <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053779/' title='IMDB: IMDb - La Dolce Vita'>La Dolce Vita</a>.  Call me a philistine, I guess.
<br><br>
<em>29) The Three Stooges (2012) - yes or no?</em>
<br><br>
Sure, why not? I've never been much of a Three Stooges kinda guy, and I probably won't see this in the theater, but I'm not actively opposed to it either. This might just be my temperament though, as there's a question like this in every quiz, and I'm pretty sure I always answer "yes" because perhaps it feels like censorship to say "no" and who am I to judge what other folks like.
<br><br>
<em>30) Mary Wickes or Patsy Kelly?</em>
<br><br>
Boy do I suck at these.  I don't really know either one that well, but I'll go with Patsy Kelly. Because I said so, that's why.  Also, she's apparently in <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063522/' title='IMDB: Rosemarys Baby'>Rosemary's Baby</a>. So there.
<br><br>
<em>31) Best movie-related conspiracy theory</em>
<br><br>
I have no frickin idea what the "best" conspiracy theory is, but one I just ran across thanks to that <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1623757/' title='IMDB: Machete Maidens Unleashed!'>Machete Maidens Unleashed!</a> documentary is that one of the women who went over the the Philippines to film one of the many women-in-jungle-prison movies made there was never heard from again.  The folks at SLIFR have identified a couple of other good ones though, such as the rumor that Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landings on the Universal lot and the one where Steven Spielberg directed <em>Poltergeist</em>.  But the best one is probably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Side_of_the_Rainbow">The Dark Side of the Rainbow</a>....
<br><br>
<em>32) Your candidate for most misunderstood or misinterpreted movie</em>
<br><br>
I'm going to go with <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068646/' title='IMDB: The Godfather'>The Godfather</a>, for a number of reasons.  The big knock against the film is that it's "romanticized" or "sentimental", but I think that completely misses the point.  Like a lot of great gangster movies, <em>The Godfather</em> does show a sorta romantic aspect to the mafia of olden days, but it also doesn't shy away from the nasty stuff either, and the very end of the film is quite disheartening.  There's also a lot to be said about the cycle of violence in the film that many folks seem to gloss over. I suppose a lot of this is arguable, but perhaps that's why <em>The Godfather</em> is a classic.
<br><br>
<em>33) Movie that made you question your own belief system (religious or otherwise) </em>
I'm having a lot of trouble with this one, in part because it's either too specific, and I can't think of an example that matches that criteria, or it's too vague, and nearly any movie that makes me think would qualify.  I lean towards that more general version, but again, that means that there are so many movies that could fit into the answer to this question that it would really be unfair to answer with one or two movies... and I don't have time to list out hundreds!
<br><br>
Well, that wraps up this edition of the movie quiz.  I know I'm really bad at the actor/acress vs actor/actress questions, but I still love these quizzes and am already looking forward to the next one (which will hopefully be in the summer instead of skipping a season like this time)....]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002313.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002313.html</guid>
<category>Movies</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 19:46:23 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Tweets of Glory</title>
<description><![CDATA[One of the frustrating things about Twitter is that it's impossible to find something once it's gone past a few days. I've gotten into the habit of favoriting ones I find particularly funny or that I need to come back to, which is nice, as it allows me to publish a cheap Wednesday blog entry (incidentally, sorry for the cheapness of this entry) that will hopefully still be fun for folks to read.  So here are some tweets of glory:
<br><br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>"Sure, we don't have jetpacks, or live on the moon. But you wouldn't *believe* how fast we can infringe copyright."</p>&mdash; Avery Edison (@aedison) <a href="https://twitter.com/aedison/status/197057236399423489" data-datetime="2012-04-30T20:18:00+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>A Chipotle has opened next to Pink's Hot Dogs in Los Angeles, fulfilling this city's dream of a diarrhea district.</p>&mdash; Gerry Duggan (@GerryDuggan) <a href="https://twitter.com/GerryDuggan/status/194210337627705345" data-datetime="2012-04-22T23:45:27+00:00">April 22, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Trackpads are ideal for people with a tendril emerging from the chest, which I kinda wish I had for reasons entirely unrelated to trackpads.</p>&mdash; Dave (@earlypaintbrush) <a href="https://twitter.com/earlypaintbrush/status/176191999861465088" data-datetime="2012-03-04T06:27:00+00:00">March 4, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>Note: This was Stephenson's first tweet in a year and a half.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Spent yesterday building a giant hamster wheel.</p>&mdash; Neal Stephenson (@nealstephenson) <a href="https://twitter.com/nealstephenson/status/194078322815279104" data-datetime="2012-04-22T15:00:52+00:00">April 22, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>A girl once told me that peeling the labels off beer bottles was a sign that I was sexually frustrated. "So is this," I said, then sobbed.</p>&mdash; Zachary Johnson (@Zucherman) <a href="https://twitter.com/Zucherman/status/192422329266077698" data-datetime="2012-04-18T01:20:32+00:00">April 18, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
This one is obviously a variation on a million similar tweets (and, admit it, it's a thought we've all had), but the first one I saw (or at least, favorited - I'm sure it's far from the first time someone made that observation though)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>If I ever run into the kid that plays that prick Joffrey on Game of Thrones, I'm sorry - I'm beating the shit out of him.</p>&mdash; Aziz Ansari (@azizansari) <a href="https://twitter.com/azizansari/status/188658231411875841" data-datetime="2012-04-07T16:03:22+00:00">April 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>I'm sure "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" will be fun, but still seems like a ripoff of my "Grover Cleveland: Mummy Puncher."</p>&mdash; BillCorbett (@BillCorbett) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillCorbett/status/147715890417373184" data-datetime="2011-12-16T16:33:07+00:00">December 16, 2011</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>&amp;rarr; should produce a totally bitchin' unicode tiger instead of a stupid right arrow.</p>&mdash; Jeff Atwood (@codinghorror) <a href="https://twitter.com/codinghorror/status/171169518318661633" data-datetime="2012-02-19T09:49:27+00:00">February 19, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>"Well sir I'd say my weaknesses are I work too hard sometimes &amp; also I murdered all those teen runaways." --near-miss job interview answer</p>&mdash; Ken Jennings (@KenJennings) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenJennings/status/196696805306667009" data-datetime="2012-04-29T20:25:47+00:00">April 29, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br>
Well, that happened. Stay tuned for some (hopefully) more fulfilling content on Sunday...]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002309.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002309.html</guid>
<category>Computers &amp; Internet</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:36:15 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Anime Movie Corner</title>
<description><![CDATA[I have been woefully neglectful of anime over the past year and a half or so, but I've still occasionally taken in a movie here or there, and after this year's very nice <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1568921/' title='IMDB: The Secret World of Arrietty'>The Secret World of Arrietty</a>, I threw a few Anime movies I've been meaning to catch up with in my Netflix Queue.  Here are some assorted thoughts on each:

<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1474276/' title='IMDB: Summer Wars'>Summer Wars</a> - From the team that brought us <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001826.html">The Girl Who Leapt Through Time</a>, I had high hopes for this one, and for the most part, it hits the mark (the <a href="http://www.google.com/cse?cx=001005190038260932801%3Acwnfwjbqv5e&ie=UTF-8&q=summer+wars&sa=Search&siteurl=www.google.com%2Fcse%2Fhome%3Fcx%3D001005190038260932801%3Acwnfwjbqv5e&ref=www.haibane.info%2F2012%2F04%2F28%2Frenting-bytes-the-case-for-digital-non-ownership%2Fcomment-page-1%2F#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=summer%20wars&gsc.page=1">Otakusphere also seems pretty enamored</a> with it).  It certainly inherits the former film's knack for good pacing, and it displays a good balance between simple, heartfelt drama and more fantastical framing elements.  In this case, the drama is derived from our math nerd hero Kenji and his schoolboy crush on Natsuki.  When Natsuki makes a cryptic request for help during summer vacation, Kenji jumps at the opportunity.  It seems Natsuki is from an influential, if not particularly wealthy family, and they're all gathering together to celebrate the matriarch's 90th birthday. Natsuki wants Kenji to pretend to be her fiance in order to please her grandmother. This side of the story makes for a sorta comedy of errors, with a stack of misfortune continually piling up on Kenji, until he starts to fight back.
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/summerwars02.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/summerwars02_sm.jpg" alt="Natsuki and Kenji share a moment" border="0"></a>
</div>
The more fantastical element of the story is a ridiculously connected social network called Oz.  It is very reminiscent of Stephenson's Metaverse from <em>Snow Crash</em>, though I guess you could say that Oz is what Second Life wishes it could be... and it's also an object lesson on why such a centralized system is improbable and foolish.  As portrayed in the movie, Oz has over billion users, and the system provides an infrastructure for all aspects of life, from commerce and banking to socializing and gaming to government services. It's a comprehensive network, and it can be accessed from just about anywhere (i.e. computers, phones, televisions, other appliances, etc...).  And it's centralized, so when something goes wrong, things get reallly hairy out here in meatspace.
<br><br>
The crux of the story arises when Kenji, who spends his free time as an admin in Oz, gets a mysterious message consisting entirely of a sequence of numbers.  Being a math nerd who is clearly in over his head when pretending to be Natsuki's fiance, he relishes the opportunity to solve a more orderly problem, which he does.  But then, something bad starts to happen.  It seems that the problem he solved has allowed someone to start hacking Oz accounts... using Kenji's avatar (I won't discuss exactly who this is, but I will say that it fits with the Japanese relationship with technology... and in this case, of course, it's all the fault of Americans).  This does not improve his reputation with Natsuki's family.
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/summerwars01.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/summerwars01_sm.jpg" alt="A look inside Oz" border="0"></a>
</div>
I won't get into more details after that, but it's a really fun story. If, that is, you can get past the absurdity of Oz's overly-connected monopoly on life.  I have to admit that the premise of Oz bothered me at first, but once I got past that, things proceeded well from there.  We're treated to a very nice family dynamic, including the wonderful grandmother character, who utilizes her own low-tech social network to bring her family (and perhaps the country) together during a crisis. The romance at the heart of the story is well done, as is the conflict in Oz.  Visually, it's a gorgeous and inventive movie, and that certainly helps with the pacing.  Overall, it totally won me over, despite some misgivings at the heart of the premise. ***
</li>
<li><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1121794/' title='IMDB: Sword of the Stranger'>Sword of the Stranger</a> - This is a movie that I don't really remember adding to my queue (nor where I saw the recommendation, as it's not typical Otakusphere material, and thus I can't find any real references to it there), but I'm glad I did, as it ended up being a very entertaining, if a bit harrowing, experience.  The story is rather simplistic: a young Japanese boy named Kotaro is being hunted by a group of Chinese swordsmen for mysterious reasons.  While fleeing, Kotaro and his dog run across a nameless Ronin, and a... fatherly? brotherly? relationship develops between them.  The Ronin is quite talented, but is haunted by a life of violence, and does not want to fight.  As the villains close in on our heroes, he has to make a choice: flee or fight?  
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/sots01.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/sots01_sm.jpg" alt="Sword of the Stranger" border="0"></a>
</div>
So it's a premise that isn't expanding any horizons, but the visual style of the film and the way the action sequences are constructed certainly make up for any shortcomings on the story front. That being said, I did find the villains interesting, as well as the nationalities of various characters.  There are Chinese in the film, and I believe they're speaking in both Mandarin and Japanese at times (not really that familiar with either language, but that's the impression I got), and then there's the "Western" swordsman who travels with the villains.  He's a force of nature, taking on all comers, but often bored by their paltry resistance.  His goal seems less focused on hunting down the child than on finding a worthy opponent (which he does, in the form of the aforementioned Ronin). Again, not sure what the significance of all these nationalities means, but I feel like there's probably something there.  It is quite a graphically violent movie, bloody and grim at times, especially towards the end of the film, but the movie does an excellent job establishing stakes and putting our heroes through their paces.  ***</li>
<li><a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0851578/' title='IMDB: Paprika'>Paprika</a> - Another movie that doesn't seem to appear much in the Otakusphere, and again, I don't remember where I found the recommendation.  I have mixed feelings about the movie, and I have to admit that I may not have given it an entirely fair shake.  I watched it in two sittings, with the first one being late at night when I probably wasn't in any condition to give the film the level of attention it warrants.  It's basically about how a new psychological device allows people to enter into one another's dreams, and then how that technology starts to break down. Paprika is one of the characters avatars, a redheaded superhero in the world of dreams, but a straightlaced psychologist out here in the real world.  The film is visually spectacular, but the blurry line between dreams and reality gets to be a bit bewildering.  You can almost never tell where you are or what's really going on.  Again, I feel like this is a movie that demands multiple viewings (or at least, a more attentive viewing than I gave it) in order to break down what's really happening. My initial reaction was one of interest that was ultimately not very well fulfilled.  I enjoyed my time with the movie and was never bored, but I wasn't particularly blown away by the story, which seemed fragmented and unclear.
<div class="image">
<a href="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/paprika.jpg"><img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/screenshots/anime/misc/paprika_sm.jpg" alt="Paprika" border="0"></a>
</div>
The film was apparently a big influence on Christopher Nolan's <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/' title='IMDB: Inception'>Inception</a>, and there may be some common DNA between the two films, but Paprika's dreams are decidedly more dreamlike (i.e. uncanny and shifting and strange).  There are some visual motifs that probably demand some sort of symbolic analysis, but again, I wasn't really up to that task upon first viewing. Again, we've got a story that explores Japan's uncomfortable relationship with technology, a theme that seems to run across a lot of postwar Japanese films and television (for obvious reasons, though this movie doesn't resort to direct mushroom cloud symbolism or anything). Ultimately, I'm not entirely sure the film worked for me, but even if it didn't, I'm still impressed by the ambition here.  Call it an interesting failure at worst, and it may be even better than I'm making it out to be. It's certainly a movie I'd like to check out again sometime...  At the very least, they tried to do a lot of interesting things!
</li>
</ul>
And that about covers it for now.  I have a few series in my Netflix queue, but I'm not sure if or when I'll get to them. The only one I see in my Watch Instantly queue is Samurai 7, which has been on the list for a while and appeals to my love of the original <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0047478/' title='IMDB: Seven Samurai'>Seven Samurai</a> (and the many riffs on the same story).]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002308.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002308.html</guid>
<category>Anime</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:09:34 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Recent Podcastery</title>
<description><![CDATA[I like podcasts and listen to many different ones, but it seems that the ones that I actually look forward to are few and far between.  Here are a few recent additions to the rotation:
<ul>
<li><a href="http://extrahotgreat.com/">Extra Hot Great</a> - This has been my favorite recent discovery, and over the past couple months, I think I've burned my way through their entire archive (80 episodes, plus a crapton of "Mini" episodes).  Great personalities and commentary, a solid format with some inventive segments, and plenty of fun.  A typical episode starts with a quick discussion of a recent TV series or movie (incidentally, tons of spoilers, so be forewarned), followed by some miscellaneous segments (my favorites being "I am not a crackpot" where people lay out their crackpot ideas, and "The most awesome thing I saw on television this week" in which Kim Reed gives a hysterical plot summary of the most ridiculous shows that she apparently watches a lot of), and then The Canon, in which someone presents a single television episode for induction into the Extra Hot Great Canon.  The Canon is a surprisingly well rounded affair, with lots of variety and really in-depth discussions.  The folks on the podcast are actually quite discerning in their judgement, and it's always interesting listening. Each podcast ends with a "Game Time" segment, during which you realize that these people know way more about television than you (or, well, me).  It's more television focused than my usual preferred podcasts, but I love it anyway.  Very fun and interesting stuff. Highly recommended!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.avclub.com/features/reasonable-discussions/">Onion AV Club Reasonable Discussions</a> - The Onion somewhat recently revamped their podcast and it was really great.  They discuss music, movies, and television, and they're usually pretty insightful folks.  They don't quite have a big format like Extra Hot Great, but it's still an interesting podcast. Alas, they seem to be on something of a hiatus right now (no podcast in about a month).  I hope they do bring it back though, as it was solid.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/podcasts/culturegabfest.html">Slate's Culture Gabfest</a> - I think this might be the most pretentious thing I have ever heard, but it's actually pretty approachable, even if they sometimes let loose with a massive wave of elitist snobbery from time to time. I probably disagree with them more often than not, but they tend to tackle interesting subjects from week to week.  Another podcast without formally defined segments, but they usually have three culturally significant things to discuss, and end every episode with an "endorsement" of something they enjoyed during that week.</li>
</ul>
That's all for now....]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002303.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002303.html</guid>
<category>Arts &amp; Letters</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:19:07 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Cabin in the Woods</title>
<description><![CDATA[It's difficult to talk about this movie without spoiling it, but I'll start with the notion that if you're a fan of horror movies, you should really go see this(more spoilertastic commentary will be below the fold).  This is rather strange, as the movie isn't entirely a horror film, though it contains lots of horror elements and tropes.  It's not really a horror comedy either, though it is very funny at times.  It's got satirical elements, but it's not really a satire.  It's a strange beast, but a very interesting one.  Movies like this don't come around that often, so check it out.
<br><br>
Again, trying to avoid spoilers here, but looking at the filmmakers is instructive.  The film's got a script from Joss Whedon, which should tell you something, and then you've got Drew Goddard, a regular in the Whedon and J.J. Abrams writers stable.  In other words, expect genre deconstruction and mysterious folk lurking in the shadows.  Or something.
<br><br>
It's certainly not a perfect film, but it's probably the best thing I've seen so far this year, and the most fun too.  Unfortunately, it's hard to talk about it for fear of spoiling.  It's not a movie that relies on a single twist or anything and you can tell from the movie's title what's coming.  Heck, it's not so much a title as it is a premise: kids go to a cabin in the woods.  Guess what happens next?  But Whedon and Goddard make the sub-genre feel fresh in a way you don't see very often. Again, it's not reliant on a big surprise, but rather a series of small twists and tweaks, starting from the first scene in the film, none of which are particularly earth-shattering on their own, but which build upon each other to create an effective cumulative result.  Again, if you're a fan of horror movies, you need to see this.
<br><br>
Well, that's probably enough trying to skirt around the details.  <strong>Spoilers aho, fun ahoy!</strong>

]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002300.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002300.html</guid>
<category>Movies</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:51:39 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Link Dump</title>
<description><![CDATA[I'm gonna be taking a trip to The Cabin in The Woods tonight, so time is sparse, thus some linkys for you:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.haibane.info/2012/04/18/in-defense-of-microsoft-word/">In Defense of Microsoft Word</a> - Aziz makes a nice argument in response to <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/04/microsoft_word_is_cumbersome_inefficient_and_obsolete_it_s_time_for_it_to_die_.single.html">incessant whinging</a> on the internets:
<blockquote>It&#8217;s certainly true that using Word for simple text like email or blog posts is overkill, in much the same way that using a jet engine to drive your lawnmower is overkill. What&#8217;s peculiar is that rather than using simpler tools for their simpler tasks, these people have declared that the more complex and capable tool is "obsolete" and "must die". This attitude betrays a type of phobia towards technology that I suspect has grown more prevalent as our technology interfaces have become increasingly more "dumbed down".</blockquote>
I mostly agree with Aziz.  While I haven't used Word (or a Word processor in general) in my personal life in years, I use it every day at work, and the notion that you can't use Word to collaborate is bonkers.  It may not be the <em>best</em> tool for that, but it's certainly not something that needs to die. An interesting post...
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2012/04/books-bits-vs-atoms.html">Books: Bits vs. Atoms</a> - Those who have enjoyed my <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002280.html">recent</a> <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002290.html">bloviating</a> about ebooks will probably get a kick out of this... better organized... take on the subject (that being said, we cover a lot of the same ground).</li>
<li><a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2012/04/understanding-amazons-strategy.html">What Amazon's ebook strategy means</a> - Speaking of ebooks, Charlie Stross clearly lays out why Amazon is dominating the ebook market, how the publishers shot themselves in the foot by practically insisting that Amazon dominate the market, why it's a bad situation to be in, and how publishers can take some steps in the right direction.  Hint: get rid of DRM, you dummies! There's a lot of lawsuits and wanking in the book and ebook industry right now, and it's tempting to take sides with Amazon or the publishers or Apple or whoever, but the more I read about it, the more I think that everyone is to blame.  So far, this hasn't really impacted us consumers that much, but it certainly could.  Here's to hoping these folks get their heads bolted on straight in the near future.</li>
<li><a href="http://io9.com/5901222/neal-stephenson-has-a-hard-time-talking-about-swordplay-in-the-mongoliad-trailer">Neal Stephenson has a hard time talking about swordplay</a> - Normally I find "trailers" for books to be mildly embarrassing (the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWs1h5WAjWY">trailer for Stephenson's Anathem</a> is a particularly bad example), but this one is pretty funny.  No idea how much of it will be represented in the forthcoming paperback release of The Mongoliad, but still.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/2012/04/10/my-big-pax-post">Gabe's PAX Post</a> - Gabe from Penny Arcade helps run huge video game conventions that are explicitely targeted towards players (most conventions are about general technology or development, and are targeted towards journalists or developers).  As one of the creators and organizers, Gabe has to deal with all sorts of crap, and he covers a few of these, including a little prank he played on a troll, and a vexing problem concerning boobies (aka the perennial Booth Babe issue).  Read the whole thing, but the key graph is this:
<blockquote>How about all of you that hate me get together and have your own conference. I need you to decide if half naked girls are empowered or exploited because I&#8217;m doing my fucking best here and it&#8217;s apparently always wrong. I swear to God I don&#8217;t understand how I&#8217;m supposed to know if I&#8217;m promoting the patriarchy or criminalizing the female body.</blockquote>
As <a href="http://stevenrayorr.com/2012/04/10/how-to-be-a-feminist">Steven notes</a>, this is a cry for help. I wish I had answers, but fortunately, I'm not in Gabe's position.  I can just treat people equally and be happy with that.
</li>
</ul>
That's all for now.  Also, go Flyers.  ]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002296.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002296.html</guid>
<category>Neal Stephenson</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:09:37 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Kickstarted</title>
<description><![CDATA[When the whole Kickstarter thing started, I went through a number of phases. First, it's a neat idea and it leverages some of the stuff that makes the internet great.  Second, as my systems analyst brain started chewing on it, I had some reservations... but that was shortlived as, third, some really interesting stuff started getting funded.  Here are some of the ones I'm looking forward to:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/singularityco/singularity-and-co/">Singularity & Co. - Save the SciFi!</a> - Yeah, so you'll be seeing a lot of my nerdy pursuits represented here, and this one is particularly interesting.  This is a project dedicated to saving SF books that are out of print, out of circulation, and, ironically, unavailable in any sort of digital format.  The Kickstarter is funding the technical solution for scanning the books as well as tracking down and securing copyright.  Judging from the response (over $50,000), this is a venture that has found a huge base of support, and I'm really looking forward to discovering some of these books (some of which are from well known authors, like Arthur C. Clarke).</li>
<li><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/zefrank/a-show-with-ze-frank">A Show With Ze Frank</a> - One of the craziest things I've seen on the internet is Ze Frank's <a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/">The Show</a>.  Not just the content, which is indeed crazy, but the sheer magnitude of what he did - a video produced every weekday for an entire year.  Ze Frank grew quite a following at the time, and in fact, half the fun was his interactions with the fans.  Here's to hoping that <a href="http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/07/070606.html">Sniff, hook, rub, power</a> makes another appearance. And at $146 thousand, I have no idea what we're in for.  I always wondered how he kept himself going during the original show, but now at least he'll be funded.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/582573991/oast-house-hop-farm-sustainable-farming">Oast House Hop Farm</a> - And now we come to my newest obsession: beer.  This is a New Jersey farm that's seeking to convert a (very) small portion of their land into a Hop Farm.  Hops in the US generally come from the west coast (Washington's Yakima valley, in particular).  In the past, that wasn't the case, but some bad luck (blights and infestations) brought east coast hops down, then Prohibition put a nail in the coffin. The farm hopes to supply NJ brewers as well as homebrewers, so mayhaps I'll be using some of their stuff in the future!  So far, they've planted Cascade and Nugget hops, with Centennial and Newport coming next.  I'm really curious to see how this turns out.  My understanding is that it takes a few years for a hop farm to mature, and that each crop varies.  I wonder how the East Coast environs will impact the hops...</li>
<li><a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1119215224/american-beer-blogger-pilot-episode">American Beer Blogger</a> - Despite the apparent failure of Discovery's <a href="http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/brew-masters/">Brewmasters</a>, there's got to be room for some sort of beer television show, and famous beer blogger and author Lew Bryson wants to give it a shot.  The Kickstarter is just for the pilot episode, but assuming things go well, there may be follow up efforts.  I can only hope it turns out well.  I enjoyed Brewmasters for what it was, but being centered on Dogfish Head limited it severely.  Sam Calagione is a great, charismatic guy, but the show never really captured the amazing stuff going on in the US right now (which is amazing because it is so broad and local and a million other things Brewmasters couldn't really highlight given its structure).</li>
</ul>
Well, there you have it.  I... probably should have been linking to these before they were funded, but whatever, I'm really happy to see that all of these things will be coming.  I'm still curious to see if this whole Kickstarter thing will remain sustainable, but I guess time will tell, and for now, I'm pretty happy with the stuff being funded.  There are definitely a ton of other campaigns that I think are interesting, especially surrounding beer and video games, but I'm a little tight on time here, so I'll leave it at that...]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002293.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002293.html</guid>
<category>Science Fiction</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:28:09 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>More Disgruntled, Freakish Reflections on ebooks and Readers</title>
<description><![CDATA[While I have some <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002280.html">pet peeves with the Kindle</a>, I've mostly found it to be a good experience.  That being said, there are some things I'd love to see in the future.  These aren't really complaints, as some of this stuff isn't yet available, but there are a few opportunities afforded by the electronic nature of eBooks that would make the whole process better.

<ul>
<li><strong>The Display</strong> - The electronic ink display that the basic Kindles use is fantastic... for reading text.  Once you get beyond simple text, things are a little less fantastic.  Things like diagrams, artwork, and photography aren't well represented in e-ink, and even in color readers (like the iPad or Kindle Fire), there are issues with resolution and formatting that often show up in eBooks.  Much of this comes down to technology and cost, both of which are improving quickly.  Once stuff like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferometric_modulator_display">IMOD</a> displays start to deliver on their promise (low power consumption, full color, readable in sunlight, easy on the eyes, capable of supporting video, etc...), we should see a new breed of reader. 
<br><br>
I'm not entirely sure how well this type of display will work, at least initially.  For instance, how will it compare to the iPad 3's display? What's the resolution like? How much will it cost? And so on.  Current implementations aren't full color, and I suspect that future iterations will go through a phase where the tech isn't quite there yet... but I think it will be good enough to move forward.  I think Amazon will most certainly jump on this technology when it becomes feasible (both from a technical and cost perspective).  I'm not sure if Apple would switch though.  I feel like they'd want a much more robust and established display before they committed.</li>
<li><strong>General Metrics and Metadata </strong>- While everyone would appreciate improvements in device displays, I'm not sure how important this would be.  Maybe it's just me, but I'd love to see a lot more in the way of metadata and flexibility, both about the book and about device usage.  With respect to the book itself, this gets to the whole page number issue I was whinging about in my <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002280.html">previous post</a>, but it's more than that.  I'd love to see a statistical analysis of what I'm reading, on both individual and collective levels.  
<br><br>
I'm not entirely sure what this looks like, but it doesn't need to be rocket science.  Simple <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch-Kincaid_readability_test">Flesch-Kincaid grades</a> seems like an easy enough place to start, and it would be pretty simple to implement.  Calculating such things for my entire library (or a subset of my library), or ranking my library by grade (or similar sorting methods) would be interesting.  I don't know that this would provide a huge amount of value, but I would personally find it very illuminating and fun to play around with... and it would be very easy to implement.  Individual works wouldn't even require any processing power on the reader, it could be part of the download.  Doing calculations of your collective library might be a little more complicated, but even that could probably be done in the cloud.
<br><br>
Other metadata would also be interesting to view.  For example, <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/6188721-mciocco">Goodreads</a> will graph your recently read books by year of publication - a lot of analysis could be done about your collection (or a sub-grouping of your collection) of books along those lines.  Groupings by decade or genre or reading level, all would be very interesting to know.</li>
<li><strong>Personal Metrics and Metadata</strong> - Basically, I'd like to have a way to track my reading speed.  For whatever reason, this is something I'm always trying to figure out for myself.  I've never gone through the process of actually recording my reading habits and speeds because it would be tedious and manual and maybe not even all that accurate.  But now that I'm reading books in an electronic format, there's no reason why the reader couldn't keep track of what I'm reading, when I'm reading, and how fast I'm reading.  My anecdotal experience suggests that I read anywhere from 20-50 pages an hour, depending mostly on the book.  As mentioned in the previous post, a lot of this has to do with the arbitrary nature of page numbers, so perhaps standardizing to a better metric (words per minute or something like that) would normalize my reading speed.
<br><br>
Knowing my reading speed and graphing changes over time could be illuminating.  I've played around a bit with speed reading software, and the results are interesting, but not drastic.  In any case, one thing that would be really interesting to know when reading a book would be how much time you have left before you finish.  Instead of having 200 pages, maybe you have 8 hours of reading time left. 
<br><br>
Combining my personal data with the general data could also yield some interesting results.  Maybe I read trashy SF written before 1970 much faster than more contemporary literary fiction.  Maybe I read long books faster than short books. There are a lot of possibilities here.
<br><br>
There are a few catches to this whole personal metrics thing though.  You'd need a way to account for breaks and interruptions.  I might spend three hours reading tonight, but I'm sure I'll take a break to get a glass of water or answer a phone call, etc...  There's not really an easy way around this, though there could be mitigating factors like when the reader goes to sleep mode or something like that. Another problem is that one device can be used by multiple people, which would require some sort of profile system.  That might be fine, but it also adds a layer of complexity to the interface that I'm sure most companies would like to avoid. The biggest and most concerning potential issue is that of privacy.  I'd love to see this information about myself, but would I want Amazon to have access to it?  On the other hand, being able to aggregate data from all Kindles might prove interesting in its own right.  Things like average reading speed, number of books read in a year, and so on.  All interesting and useful info.
<br><br>
This would require an openness and flexibility that Amazon has not yet demonstrated.  It's encouraging that the Kindle Fire runs a flavor of Android (an open source OS), but on the other hand, it's a forked version that I'm sure isn't as free (as in speech) as I'd like (and from what I know, the Fire is partially limited by its hardware).  Expecting comprehensive privacy controls from Amazon seems naive.
<br><br>
I'd like to think that these metrics would be desirable to a large audience of readers, but I really have no inclination what the mass market appeal would be.  It's something I'd actually like to see in a lot of other places too.  Video games, for instance, provide a lot of opportunity for statistics, and some games provide a huge amount of data on your gaming habits (be it online or in a single player mode).  Heck, half the fun of sports games (or sports in general) is tracking the progress of your players (particularly prospects).  Other games provide a lack of depth that is most baffling. People should be playing meta-games like Fantasy Baseball, but with MLB The Show providing the data instead of real life.</li>
<li><strong>The Gamification of Reading</strong> - Much of the above wanking about metrics could probably be summarized as a way to make reading a game. The metrics mentioned above readily lend themselves to point scores, social-app-like badges, and leaderboards.  I don't know that this would necessarily be a good thing, but it could make for an intriguing system.  There's an <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002057.html">interesting psychology at work</a> in systems like this, and I'd be curious to see if someone like Amazon could make reading more addictive.  Assuming most people don't try to abuse the system (though there will always be a cohort that will attempt to exploit stuff like this), it could ultimately lead to beneficial effects for individuals who "play" the game competitively with their friends.  Again, this isn't necessarily a good thing. Perhaps the gamification of reading will lead to a sacrifice of comprehension in the name of speed, or other mitigating effects.  Still, it would be nice to see the "gamification of everything" used for something other than a way for companies to trick customers into buying their products.</li>
</ul>
As previously mentioned, the need for improved displays is a given (and not just for ereaders). But assuming these nutty metrics (and the gamification of reading) are an appealing concept, I'd like to think that it would provide an opening for someone to challenge Amazon in the market.  An open, flexible device using a non-DRMed format and tied to a common store would be very nice. Throw in some game elements, add a great display, and you've got something close to my ideal reader.  Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like we're all that close just yet.  Maybe in 5-10 years?  Seems possible, but it's probably more likely that Amazon will continue its dominance.]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002290.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002290.html</guid>
<category>Arts &amp; Letters</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:22:35 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Link Dump</title>
<description><![CDATA[Happy Easter everyone.  Time is short so here are some quick links:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrHkKXFRbCI">The Story of Keep Calm and Carry On</a> - I forget where I found this (Kottke, I think), but they noted that the video seriously channels the style of Wes Anderson, and it does.  It's also a mildly interesting story (and a really pretty poster).</li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwLfhh4Sd_Q">Mallrats Magic Eye - Is it actually a sailboat/schooner?</a> - Apparently not! Personally, I've never actually been able to see one of those posters.  Once I started feeling like the guy from Mallrats, I gave it up...</li>
<li><a href="http://www.geekbox.net/archives/2012/03/30/the-comedy-button-episode-23/">The Comedy Button: Episode 23</a> - AKA the Brodeo reunion. Fans of 1Up's infamous GFW radio will love it.  Unfortunately, it's all a bit of a tease. I wish these guys got together more often...</li>
<li><a href="http://fakecriterions.tumblr.com/post/20421450904/eclipse-the-mcbain-series-for-the-fake">Eclipse: The McBain Series</a> - Brilliant.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.roguesynapse.com/games/last_starfighter.php">The Last Starfighter Video Game</a> - You know the video game at the beginning of <a href='http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087597/' title='IMDB: The Last Starfighter'>The Last Starfighter</a>? Well someone went ahead and made the game (and is attempting to actually set up the arcade cabinet).</li>
</ul>

That's all for now!]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002289.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002289.html</guid>
<category>Link Dump</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:01:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Weird Movie of the Week</title>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002215.html">Last time on Weird Movie of the Week</a> we discovered some presidential badassery.  This time, we've got a ripping tale of aliens, nazis, and lasers:

<div class="image">
<img src="http://kaedrin.com/images/zonetroopers.jpg" alt="Zone Troopers poster">
</div>

Courtesy of <a href="http://badassdigest.com/2012/03/31/vault-of-secrets-aliens-yetis-and-armageddon/">Zach Carlson from Badass Digest</a>, here's a summary:
<blockquote>Watching <strong><em>Zone Troopers</em></strong>, you get the feeling that it's accidentally ten times better than it's meant to be. The plot and dialogue seem like they were written on a comic shop toilet stall: Four likeable WWII soldiers named things like "Sarge" and "Mittens" stumble across enemy lines and the Reich's most carefully guarded discovery: a massive interplanetary spacecraft. One of its pilots has escaped unharmed, and joins our boys in a full-metal lazer-battle against Hitler's lil' shits. We even get to see Eva Braun's boyfriend get smacked straight in the kisser!</blockquote>Ah, the 1980s. Apparently <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092298/">this movie is actually real</a> and is available through the magic of Manufactured-on-Demand DVD from MGM.  Or something.  ]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002283.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002283.html</guid>
<category>Movies</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:25:43 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Disgruntled, Freakish Reflections on ebooks</title>
<description><![CDATA[I had this idea for a series of posts when I was just getting started on the blog where I would rant on and on about this or that subject.  I even created a category for it!  But then, I almost immediately neglected the category.  I'm a generally amiable guy, not frequently disgruntled.  Maybe freakish though.  Anyway, I thought I'd revisit the concept.
<br><br>
So I got a Kindle for Christmas last year and have been reading as many ebooks as possible.  I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, but I have some assorted thoughts, some freakish, some disgruntled, and some just plain gruntled.
<ul>
<li>The hardware is reasonably nice.  The electronic ink display is perfect for reading.  It's a little heavy, but not much more than a typical mass-market paperback, and about on part with a medium sized trade paperback.  That being said, it's much less awkward to hold, as you don't have to fight the binding to keep the book open.  On the other hand, the touch interface isn't quite as responsive as I'd like. Not sure if this is due to the E Ink or processor power (or perhaps a bit of both).  It takes some getting used to, but it works well enough.  On rare occasions I'll accidentally flip past too many pages quickly, but that doesn't really happen enough to call it a real issue.  All in all, it's a quality device, and I'm pretty happy with it from a hardware standpoint.</li>
<li>The interface is sparing and easy to intuitively use, with the only real exception being the aforementioned lack of responsiveness on the touchscreen, which takes some getting used to. But I do love the ability to search, highlight, and annotate my books (<em>especially</em> non-fiction).  For years I've wanted to do a "CTRL F" on a book, and now I can do so easily (in the past, Google books was often helpful, though not consistent in this respect).</li>
<li>The lack of page numbers. Hoo boy, the lack of page numbers.  This is the one that makes me feel like a bit of a curmudgeonly dweeb, but I reallly miss page numbers.  Oh sure, half the time I'm converting page numbers to the percentage complete and the concept of one "page" is elastic and arbitrary in the extreme (for example, compare 1 page in <a href="http://kaedrin.com/fun/books/gravity.html">Gravity's Rainbow</a> to 1 page in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/mn/search/?_encoding=UTF8&amp;scn=283155&amp;keywords=Harry%20Potter&amp;tag=kaedrin&amp;linkCode=ur2&qid=1333335687&amp;h=ca114fef41105108f9f543e65f8de2dea1f67044&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3AHarry%20Potter">Harry Potter</a> - ostensibly the same measurement, but thanks to font size, line spacing, and margins, you'd probably have to read 3-4 pages of Harry Potter to equal 1 page of Gravity's Rainbow, and that's just from a words on the page perspective, not a literary value or density of ideas perspective), but I <em>like</em> page numbers.  I don't think this really qualifies me as a luddite, but perhaps I am a bit of a crackpot.  Still, I really miss page numbers, and the worst part is that on many occasions, the book will have page numbers available, they just aren't displayed by default.  What you get by default is just the percentage complete and the mystical "Location" number which kinda/sorta makes sense, but is still inferior to page numbers.  Maybe this is all just a frame of reference thing and I'll get used to it, but it's been a few months, and neither Location or Percentage really strike the right cord with me.  This is completely a perception thing.  I want to feel like I'm making progress and percentage doesn't increment often enough for that... On the other hand, the location increments too much as you read, making it hard to wrap my head around.  All of this would be a moot point if Amazon would just let us modify the interface (for all I know, they do, but it's not obvious where).  I know this is an old argument and I don't want to start a holy war here, but for crying out loud, it's obvious that there is a segment of Kindle consumers who fucking hate location and percentage and just want page numbers, why can't Amazon just let us choose what we want displayed?</li>
<li>Amazon sure does make it easy to purchase new books and send them to your Kindle.  The issue, of course, is that I'm not locked into Amazon's proprietary format/store.  Other stores are hit and miss as to whether or not they work with the Kindle.  <a href="http://www.baen.com/">Baen books</a> works, and will even email the file to your Kindle for you (which is nice). But Baen books is awesome like that (leave it to the hardcore SF publisher to embrace open formats and systems - the grand majority of Bujold's library is available for free online, but I bought from their store anyway, because I want to support them and Bujold).  <a href="https://play.google.com/store/books?hl=en">Google's new bookstore</a> doesn't work with Kindle, nor does <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/">Barnes &amp; Noble</a>.  So far, this hasn't been a disaster, I just hate the notion of DRM systems and being locked down.  At least Amazon seems to have made kindle readers for almost every conceivable device, so there is that. I haven't played around enough to see how well all these different readers work, etc...</li>
<li>For the most part, I don't really miss having a hard copy of most books.  There are definitely books I plan to purchase a physical copy of in the near future (*ahem* at least a couple of <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002277.html">these</a>) and I suppose there is a benefit to the physical copy that you don't get out of a digital copy, but I'm generally a pragmatic guy, and the pros seem to outweigh the cons.  <a href="http://stevenrayorr.com/2012/02/29/ebook-rambles/">Steven Ray Orr makes a pretty good case</a> for physical books, but also seems to be embracing digital copies, like me:
<blockquote>Each book and every bookshelf is a biography of the owner. If you were to explore mine, a great deal would be revealed. The obvious: science fiction, Stephen King, and political theory dominate my history; and the aesthetic of a collection is more important than strict organization.1 The odd: Twilight sits upon a stack of feminist thought; at least four Bibles line the shelves, amidsts athiest manifestos and Christian scholarship; and there is an Atari 2600 gathering dust and taking up precious space.
<br><br>
And then the books themselves, holding more than the author&#8217;s intended words with stories added by each reader: God Emperor of Dune is dog-earred on every third page; Twilight has been defaced, all red pen and hate; and numerous novels are bookmarked with old receipts or gum wrappers, indications of unsuccessful attempts.</blockquote>
And it's true, though I think at least half of my books are squirreled away in boxes in my basement.  Still, I really love that my copy of LotR is a box set bought from the Scholastic catalog in gradeschool (and that the paper is yellowing and becoming brittle with age - Jesus, those things are going on 20-25 years old now...) and I like having some reference books and whatnot available, not to mention books from my favorite authors. Like Steven says, your books say a lot about you... and we all know it. I don't think I consciously rearrange my shelves to make me seem like someone I'm not, but if I don't like a book, chances are I'm not going to want to see it often and it will thus be banished to the boxes in the basement.  But if I do like it, I'll probably keep it visible.  
<br><br>
I haven't gotten to a point where I've started buying physical books that I've read digitally, but apparently this happens somewhat frequently.  It's what <a href="http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=149">Eric S. Raymond calls an Identity Good</a>:
<blockquote>An identity good is something people buy to express their tie to a  group or category they belong to or would like to belong to. People  buy <em>The New Hacker's Dictionary</em> because they are, or want  to be, the kind of person they think should own a copy of it.</blockquote>
Interestingly, Eric is writing about how posting free copies of his books online has helped his physical book sales... in part because he tends to write books that people want to be identified with.
<blockquote>I would go so far as to predict that any book (or movie, or CD) that functions as an identity good will tend to sell more rather than less after Web exposure. All three of my in-print books happen to be identity goods rather strongly, for slightly different but overlapping populations.</blockquote>
Now, I do find this interesting, because I'm probably more willing to try something out that goes against my grain in a digital version.  Is that because it's then not sitting on my shelf? Maybe, and maybe the lack of physicality makes it seem like less of an investment.  I'll have to pay attention to this going forward...
</li>
<li>The selection of books available on Kindle seems reasonable until you start to get obscure... and unfortunately, the obscure stuff is what I really want to get after.  Some classics in various specialized fields have made their way to Kindle versions (The Mythical Man Month and Peopleware are two great, long out-of-print examples), and that's wonderful. But there are tons of things I want to read that are out of print but unavailable on Kindle.  I know that there is some work involved in digitizing books, but it's not a huge effort - tons of folks have undertaken projects like this will plenty of success.  And this is before you even get to the dumb slap-fights that Amazon is constantly getting into with the publishers.  This isn't meant to come down on one side of the issue, because everyone is to blame here, and at this point, I feel like the publishers are being a little too cagey for their own good.  Especially now that you get all these rather odd situations in which the ebook costs more than the actual book itself.  How does that work?  It's a naked money grab, and everyone knows it.  Of course, publishers should be able to set their prices to what they want, but it's patently absurd to claim that the exact same content somehow possesses more value when it's published with little to no overhead (i.e. no materials, printing, etc... neeeded).  Publishers make a lot more money on an ebook version, even when it's cheaper than a paperback (and notably, most of the time, that extra profit is not making its way to the author).  Most of the time, the books are priced reasonably (or at least cheaper than the print versions), but maybe publishers should be a little less money-grubbing. Again, it's not like readers are entitled to cheaper prices on everything all the time, but <em>that is part of the promise of digital books</em> in the first place.  It just makes no sense that an ebook would ever cost more than a physical copy (unless we're talking about a used copy or something)... This is one issue in which I tend to <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2012/01/why_publishers.php">agree with Nicholas Carr</a> on, and he has some interesting ideas about the ideal consumer need:
<blockquote>Buy the atoms, get the bits free. That just feels right - in tune with the universe, somehow.
<br><br>
There's a lesson here, I think, for book publishers. Readers today are forced to choose between buying a physical book or an ebook, but a lot of them would really like to have both on hand - so they'd be able, for instance, to curl up with the print edition while at home (and keep it on their shelves) but also be able to load the ebook onto their e-reader when they go on a trip.</blockquote>
It's a well thought out argument and I'd love it if that was ever implemented, but I'm not holding my breath either.  It's too much of a cash cow for publishers, who are probably struggling these days (another reason to perhaps not be too upset at ebook pricing) and won't see the consumer delight in getting booth a physical and electronic book in a single purchase as being enough of a benefit for them...
</li>
</ul>
And that about covers my initial thoughts on the subject.  I guess there's a fair share of disgruntlement above, and that is honest and true, but I also really do enjoy reading ebooks.  I expect a fair amount of my reading will proceed on ebooks. If they're available. Grumble, grumble.]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002280.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002280.html</guid>
<category>Arts &amp; Letters</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:11:01 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Upcoming Books</title>
<description><![CDATA[Because <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002201.html">my book queue</a> is not long enough*, it seems some of my favorite SF authors are releasing new novels in 2012. Yay**. Here are the most exciting ones, in order of anticipated publication:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1451658907/kaedrin">The Wind Through the Keyhole: A Dark Tower Novel</a> by Stephen King  (4/24/12)- I just found out about this one...  Apparently Stephen King is returning to his Dark Tower series and doing another quasi-prequel... actually ,it's a sorta sequel to the oddly placed yet strangely compelling <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0451210875/kaedrin">Wizard and Glass</a>, a novel I now consider one of my favorites in the series.  That book sorta told the origin story of Roland the Gunslinger, and this one sorta continues his early adventures.  Stephen King has never been one of my favorite authors, but I'm on board for this one...</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1612182364/kaedrin">The Mongoliad: Book One (The Foreworld Saga)</a> by Neal Stephenson, Greg Bear, and others (4/24/12) - I've <a href="http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/001823.html">written about this experiment</a> before, and to be sure, most of this content is already available, as it was serialized via custom apps on various mobile devices, but they're now collecting the first completed story in a paperback... I played around with the iPhone app, but never purchased a "subscription" as the concept of serialized books does not really appeal to me (heck, I'm the guy that doesn't catch up with TV series until the season is over), but I'd like to check out a completed story.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0765316994/kaedrin">Redshirts: A Novel with Three Codas</a> by John Scalzi (6/5/12) - I have to admit that I find the title of this sorta kitschy, but I always find myself entertained by Scalzi, and it's not like this is an actual Star Trek novel or anything.  I'm holding out hope that he'll be able to bring something unique to the tired old red-shirt cliche.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0062024434/kaedrin">Some Remarks: Essays and Other Writing</a> by Neal Stephenson (8/7/12) - I have no idea what these "Remarks" are going to be, but I'm guessing this will end up being a collection of previously published writing (like his awesome, long, rambling essays in Wired).  I'm hoping that it will contain at least some new stuff though.  Of course, I'd love another epic essay like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0380815931/kaedrin">In the Beginning...was the Command Line</a>, but I'm not actually expecting that...</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1451638450/kaedrin">Captain Vorpatril's Alliance</a> by Lois McMaster Bujold (11/6/12) - I've only got one book left in Bujold's Vorkosigan saga and was prepping for withdrawal pains, so this book will be perfectly timed to keep me addicted... Still, I'm very much looking forward to this novel, a spin-off featuring Ivan Vorpatril, one of the long-running side-characters of the series.  I'm actually pretty excited about this book and I'm hoping Bujold will continue to play in the SF space in the future...</li>
</ul>
And that covers the big books I'm most excited about this year.  Of course, there's bound to be others that I'm missing, and the queue is constantly growing, but the above will probably keep me busy for a while.
<br><br>
* Sarcasm! 
<br><br>
 ** Not sarcasm!]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002277.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002277.html</guid>
<category>Science Fiction</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:34:49 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Adventures in Brewing - Beer #8: Earl Grey Bitter Bottling</title>
<description><![CDATA[Charles, 2nd Earl Grey was prime minister of the UK for four years, backing significant reform of the British government (in particular, he architected a redistribution of seats in the House of Commons and an expansion of the right to vote).  How he came to lend his name to the famous bergamot-flavored tea is mildly mysterious.  Like a lot of historical beer origins, there appear to be a lot of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Grey_tea#History">apocryphal tales surrounding Earl Grey tea</a>, usually involving a recipe made by a Chinese mandarin.  In some accounts, the mandarin is grateful to Lord Grey because one of his men saved the mandarin's son from drowning.  The story that seems more likely to me is that the recipe was specifically formulated to suit the water at Grey's estate.  The bergamot apparently offset the lime present in the water there and when Lady Grey used it to entertain guests in London as a political hostess, it became popular enough that <a href="http://www.twinings.com/home.php">Twinings</a> sought to make it a brand.  Or something.  But enough about stuffy British politicians, let's get to the beer!
<br><br>
Bottling of my <a href="http://beer.kaedrin.com/2012/03/adventures-in-brewing---beer-8-earl-grey-bitter.html">Earl Grey bitter</a> commenced after two weeks in the fermenter.  From observation of the airlock, fermentation seemed to go well for the first two days, but then it dropped off considerably.  Given the low original gravity, this was not too surprising, but I gave it the full two weeks anyway.
<div class="image">
<img alt="Post-Fermentation, Pre-Conditioning Earl Grey Bitter " src="http://beer.kaedrin.com/images/pre-earlgrey.jpg" width="300" height="296" />
</div>
The beer turned out to be a little lighter in color than I was expecting (which is not a big deal or anything), but the aroma was quite nice.  A lot of citrus in the nose, which is exactly what I was going after.  However, I'm not entirely sure how much of that came from the bergamot tea I used in the recipe.  I had also used a small amount of orange peel, which certainly contributed something to the flavor, and it's also worth noting that Fuggle hops (even when used in bittering applications like I did) can contribute a soft, fruity aroma/flavor to the beer.  I suppose one could call this more of a variant on Earl Grey than anything else - something more like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Grey_(tea)">Lady Grey tea</a>, which also has orange (among a few other ingredients).  Well, whatever the case, it seems like it will be quite an interesting beer.
<br><br>
Final Gravity came in at around 1.010, and according to my calculations, this works out to around 4% ABV (maybe a little more), which was pretty much the target (a little over 75% attenuation, which is pretty good).  I had a bit of a worry when I first took my refractometer reading, as it came in at around 5.4°Bx, but it seems that Final Brix is a bit misleading because the alcohol distorts the readings a bit. With the <a href="http://onebeer.net/refractometer.shtml">help of the internets</a>, I was able to correct for that distortion, and all seemed well. I also took a hydrometer reading, which came out a little lower than reported above, thus the beer might be slightly stronger than expected (but still around 4.5% ABV).
<br><br>
Another point of interest is that I primed the beer with around 2.5 oz. corn sugar, about half the normal dose.  The style is typically not very highly carbonated, so I didn't want to overdo the priming sugar.  Hopefully this will work out to create something with enough carbonation, but still smooth and quaffable.  The beer actually tasted ok right now, even in its relatively flat form, so I think a minimum of carbonation would suit this nicely.
<br><br>
That about covers this beer.  It's been an interesting exercise and I can't wait to taste the final product in a couple weeks. Next up will be a Belgian-style dubbel, though I'm not entirely sure when I'll get to that and we're starting to get to the warmer months of the year, where fermentation temperature will get more difficult to control...
<br><br>
(Cross posted on <a href="http://beer.kaedrin.com/">Kaedrin Beer Blog</a> and <a href="http://tempest-in-a-teacup.blogspot.com/">Tempest in a Teacup</a>)]]></description>
<link>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002275.html</link>
<guid>http://kaedrin.com/weblog/archive/002275.html</guid>
<category>Beer</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:14:36 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>

