Kaedrin.com
You are here: Kaedrin > Weblog > Archives > January 2007 > The Diamond Age Miniseries

Kaedrin Weblog
« iPhone | Main | 2006 Kaedrin Movie Awards: Best Villain/Hero/Badass »

Saturday, January 13, 2007

The Diamond Age Miniseries
It appears that Neal Stephenson's neo-victorian nanotech novel The Diamond Age will be a miniseries on the Sci-Fi channel:
Based on Neal Stephenson's best-selling novel The Diamond Age: Or a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer, this six-hour miniseries is executive produced by George Clooney and Grant Heslov of Smokehouse Productions. A prominent member of a conservative futuristic society grows concerned that the culture stifles creativity, and commissions a controversial interactive book for his daughter, which serves as her guide through a surreal alternate world. When the primer's provocative technology, which adapts to the reader's responses, falls into the hands of a young innocent, the girl's life is accidentally reprogrammed with dangerous results. Neal Stephenson will adapt his own novel for this project, the first time the Hugo and Nebula winning author has written for the small screen.
I have mixed feelings about this. Stephenson is probably my favorite author, so I'm thrilled that his work is being adapted. However, adaptations are tricky, and I think part of the reason Stephenson's books haven't been adapted is that they're probably more difficult than most. The choice of The Diamond Age is a baffling one, given that it's universally seen as having an awfully abrubt ending (and has given the author an unfair reputation of writing bad endings). That it's a Sci-Fi Channel original series isn't exactly comforting either. They did a decent enough job with the Dune miniseries I guess, but honestly, this is that channel that brought us masterpieces like Man-Thing and Basilisk: The Serpent King (I'm serious, those two movies were both playing tonight.)

Stephenson's involvement is somewhat heartening, but also a mixed blessing. For one thing, nothing guarantees that a great novel-writer will turn out to be a great screenwriter. It's a different medium and, as such, different conventions and language apply. Given that we're talking about a Sci-Fi Channel original, I'm sure his involvement won't be a negative, but that leaves one other consideration: If he's busy working on the screenplay for this series, he's probably not working on his next book. Gah! It's been a few years, and I want me some new Stephenson.

If it turns out good, I'll be elated, but I'm wary. Think of this post as tempering my expecatations so that it can't possibly be that much of a dissapointment. Incidentally, I just ran across Ben Thompson's beautiful rant about Sci-Fi Channel Original Movies:
Nothing makes me happier when I'm flipping through the channels on a rainy Saturday afternoon than stumbling upon whatever god-awful original home-grown suckfest-and-craptasm movie is playing on the Sci-Fi Channel. Nowhere else can you find such a clusterfuck of horrible plot contrivances and ill-conceived premises careening face-first into a brick wall of one-dimensional cardboard characters and banal, inane, poorly-delivered dialogue. While most television stations and movie production houses out there are attempting to retain some shred of dignity or at least a modicum of credibility, it's nice to know that the Sci-Fi Channel has no qualms whatsoever about brazenly showing twenty minute-long fight scenes involving computer-generated dinosaurs, dragons, insects, aliens, sea monsters and Gary Bussey all shooting laser beams at each other and battling for control of a planet-destroying starship as the self-destruct mechanism slowly ticks down and the fate of a thousand parallel universes hangs in the balance. You really have to give the execs at Sci-Fi credit for basically just throwing their hands up in the air and saying, "well let's just take all this crazy shit and mash it together into one giant ridiculous mess". Nothing is off-limits for those folks; if you want to see American troops in Iraq battle a giant man-eating Chimaera, you've got it. A genetically-altered Orca Whale the eats seamen and icebergs? Check. A plane full of mutated pissed-off killer bees carrying the Hanta Virus? Check.
Brilliant. Ironically, I'm more excited for The Diamond Age miniseries now that I read that. Something's wrong with me.
Where am I?
This post is part of the Kaedrin Weblog. It's been categorized under Movies , Neal Stephenson and was originally published in January 2007.

Inside Weblog
Archives
Best Entries
Fake Webcam
email me
Kaedrin Beer Blog

Green Flag

6 Comments

It worries me that Sci-Fi is making this, but I'm glad that TDA is finally going to be a movie!

Indeed. And I seem to like TDA more than most Stephenson fans, but I still wonder why that's the one they chose. Personally, I think Zodiac would be right up Hollywood's alley. I mean, it's short, relatively action packed, it's about the environment, corporations are the major bad guy, etc... I think it'd make an excellent movie, provided that it attract good talent...

The fact that George "Don't Hate me because I'm beautiful, hate me because I'm infantile and self-absorbed" Clooney is producing the thing cannot be taken as a good sign.

The Diamond Age seems a little too abstract for television. Snow Crash seems like such an obvious choice. Swordfighting. Virtual worlds. Near future. They could try and Matrix-ifiy it. I don't know if it would be any good, but it seems like an easier target than Diamond age. This is the stuff that sci-fi movies feed on.

Plus, Snow Crash had an ending.

Yeah, the Clooney involvement does give pause, though I think it's mixed. Clooney does seem to align himself with decent talent (i.e. South Park, Tarantino, Coen Brothers, Soderberg), but then again, Batman & Robin.

I agree about Snow Crash. The problem with that is that if it ever does get made, it will be something bigger than a Sci-Fi channel original. For a while, James Cameron was talking about it (and I've been reading about Avatar, which seems like a movie where he plundered many concepts from Snow Crash, including the sarcastic naming conventions - he's got a substance called unobtanium in the movie, which is a very Snow Crashy type name). A Snow Crash movie has been stuck in development hell pretty much since it was published. TDA may be happening because it isn't the obvious choice.

Comforting, isn't it? That is, if you believe my off-the-cuff ramblings, which are certainly not authoritative:P

TDA is one of favorite books of all time.

I am unequivocally happy about the TV show, with Stephenson writing it.

The book is the book and nothing can do it any harm. The film may be brilliant, or may have brilliant moments, or may allow Stephenson to do things that were not done in the book. Who knows?

I just see no downside to this happening.

I am looking forward to seeing if Stephenson does anything different for the series. And in a lot of ways, there really isn't a downside, so maybe you're right. I'm looking forward to it, but I obviously want it to be good, you know:P

Leave a comment

Comments are closed for this entry. Thank you for your interest and sorry for any inconvience.

 



Copyright © 1999 - 2012 by Mark Ciocco.