| Kaedrin Weblog | |
|
Sunday, June 26, 2005
Bookmark Aggregation This is hardly new, but since I've often observed the need for better information aggregation tools I figured I'd give del.icio.us a plug. del.icio.us is essentially an online bookmark (or favorites, in IE-speak) repository. It allows you to post sites to your own personal collection of links. This is great for those who frequently access the internet from multiple locations and different browsers (i.e. from work and home) as it is always accessible on the web. But the really powerful thing about del.icio.us is that everyone's bookmarks are public and easily viewable, and there are all sorts of ways to aggregate and correllate bookmarks. They like to call the system a social bookmarks manager. The system uses a tagging scheme (or flat hierarchy, if you prefer) to organize links. In the context of a system like del.icio.us, tagging essentially means that for each bookmark you add, you choose a number of labels or categories (tags) which are used to organize your bookmarks so you can find them later. Again, since del.icio.us is a public system, you can see what other people are posting to the same tags. This becomes a good way to keep up on a particular topic (for example, CSS, the economy, movies, tacos or cheese). Jon Udell speculates that posted links would follow a power law distribution, where a few individuals really stand out as the most reliable contributors of valuable links for a given topic. Unfortunately, del.icio.us isn't particularly great at sorting that out yet (though you may be able to notice such patterns emerging if you really keep up on a topic and who is posting what, which can be somewhat daunting for popular tags like CSS, but perhaps not so for something more obscure like unicode). Udell also notes how useful tagging is when trying to organize something that you think will be useful in the future. Tagging is a concept whose time has come, and despite its drawbacks, I have a feeling that 10 years from now, we're all going to look back and wonder how the heck we accomplished anything before something like tagging rolled around. del.icio.us certainly isn't the only site using tagging (Flickr has tagged photos, Technorati uses tags for blog posts, and there are several other sites). Of course, the concept does have its problems; namely, how do you know which tags to use? For instance, one of the more popular general subjects on del.icio.us is blogs and blogging, but what tags should be used? Blog, Blogging, Blogs, Weblog, Weblogs, blogosphere and so on... Luckily del.icio.us is getting better and better at this - their "experimental post" works wonders because it is actually able to recommend tags you should use based on what tags other people have used. The system is actually quite simple and easy to use, but there's not much in the way of documentation. Check out this blog post or John Udell's screencast for some quick tutorials on how to get started. I've been playing around with it more and more, and it's proving very useful on multiple levels (organizing links I come across as well as finding new links in the first place!). If you're interested, you can check out my bookmarks. Some other interesting functionality:
The important thing about del.icio.us is not that it was designed to create the perfect information resource, but rather an efficient system of collaboration. It's a systemic improvement; as such, the improvement in information output is an emergent property of internet use. Syndication, aggregation, and filtering on the internet still need to improve considerably, but this seems like a step in the right direction. |
Where am I?
This post is part of the Kaedrin Weblog. It's been categorized under
Computers & Internet
and was originally published in June 2005.
Inside Weblog Archives Best Entries Fake Webcam email me ![]() |
|
Comments
There's something strangely satisfying with all this tagging. Maybe it's some weird obsessive-compulsive organisational thing. Anyway, this blogger, Michiel, makes a point here that users could really benefit from an agent that would handle gathering information/search results based on tags that knows what different tags to use that should be grouped together either because of slight variations in the terminology (such as "weblog," "weblogs," "blog," "blogs," "blogging," and on and on and on) or language (such as "pants," "pantelones," etc.), which sounds like it would be really helpful. Obviously those of us who think of this sort of thing would think to look for interesting weblogs not only under the "weblogs" tag but a number of variants as well, although that requires patience we (or, at least, I) don't always have. For a while, with my own del.icio.us bookmarks, I was throwing in whatever tags I could possibly think of, including somewhat redundant ones (like "reznor" and "trentreznor") but that gets a little old. The new recommended tag thing is nifty. Posted by: DyRE on June 29, 2005 3:42 AM
Ack. Well, the HTML in that comment wasn't allowed, apparently (and understandably). Ehm, well the post made by that blogger I referenced can be found here: http://acidzebra.blogspot.com/2005/01/its-agents-stupid.html Posted by: DyRE on June 29, 2005 3:47 AM
Yes agents seem to be a good match to something like del.icio.us. I also liked his idea bout collecting all the disparate tags from other sites that use them into one large database. That would be pretty neat. What's your del.icou.us name? I'll "subscribe" if you're interesting enough:P Posted by: Mark on June 30, 2005 9:04 PM
My del.icio.us username is dentaku and I hope you find my links both interesting and nutritious. Posted by: DyRE on July 1, 2005 6:38 AM
Comments are closed for this entry. Thank you for your interest and sorry for any inconvience. Trackbacks
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Bookmark Aggregation' from Kaedrin Weblog.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://kaedrin.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/143. |
|
Copyright © 1999 - 2007 by Mark Ciocco.
|