Well in that case, tallman...

...I'll have to go with what Robert Scheer said of Wolfowitz: "Even his correction needs correcting." There were no nuclear weapons and their was no nuclear weapons program. Last Sunday, he cited the story of the man who had buried a nuclear component under a bush 12 years ago as evidence of a past nuclear program. All this demonstrates is that there was a nuclear program before the first Gulf War. The man said he was to bury it there and await an order to dig it up when and if the program was revived. That order never came. So by mentioning this story, Cheney was actually providing evidence that there was no revived nuclear weapons program, yet he puts the spin in the opposite direction. Can't you see that?

More weasel words from tricky Dicky:

MR. RUSSERT: The Washington Post asked the American people about Saddam Hussein, and this is what they said: 69 percent said he was involved in the September 11 attacks. Are you surprised by that?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: No. I think it’s not surprising that people make that connection.

I guess this particular weasling was just too much to swallow, so Rummy and Bush had to come out and say that there is no connection. Cheney is an expert at on-the-fly spin and propaganda.